Recently, “Taiwan” has become something of a catchphrase. Just when we thought all that talk about “loving Taiwan” that was popular during the terms of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had disappeared, it has become a new way of seeking redemption for one’s political sins.
Pan-blue parties, and even the Chinese Communist Party, are resorting to using it as a catchphrase more than the pan-green camp.
First, senior officials from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government, who have been failing terribly at everything lately, led by Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), have been falling over themselves to view Taiwanese director Chi Po-lin’s (齊柏林) documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan From Above (看見台灣).
After seeing the documentary, they reportedly walked out of the cinema with tears in their eyes and it was even rumored that a special Cabinet meeting would be held in which the film would be the main discussion point.
Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏), who recently accused environmental groups and celebrity activists of being politically motivated, made a surprising move by saying that the agency is doing everything it can to save the environment.
One cannot help but wonder whether he has seen the destruction done to the beauty of nation’s east coast.
Of course, first lady Chow Mei-ching (周美青) and Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) were quick to join in and become promoters of environmental protection, boosting their political images in the process.
It is not only senior officials of local governments who are fond of watching the film. Senior Chinese officials have also said they want to listen to the different voices of Taiwan.
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) Chairman Chen Deming (陳德銘) said that he has come to Taiwan to gain an understanding of what Taiwanese think.
Maybe there was something in the nation’s air that did not agree with him, because during his visit he yelled at a group of protesting students and asked them how many people they were actually capable of representing.
Of course, protesting students cannot represent the opinions of those who are treating people like Chen to dinner every night, including pan-blue politicians such as New Taipei City (新北市) Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) and Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌).
It is remarkable that while Chen knows full well that he is wining and dining with legislators and others who wield executive power, he chooses to blame the failure of the cross-strait service trade agreement to pass in the legislature on protesting students.
I really do not see why Chen does not simply get his powerful friends to kick those who are against the agreement out of the legislature and then force a vote on the issue.
Do the government officials who have been in power for so long or those officials who view Taiwan as their “home away from home” really want to see the nation and hear what the Taiwanese have to say?
Is it really that difficult? Do they really have to see Taiwan from the skies above to see it clearly and be moved by it?
Surely, if these officials want to see the nation’s true life-force, all they have to do is turn on the television, flick through the papers, walk among the public and listen to what people are saying at protests.
Perhaps the hardest thing for politicians is to hear different voices and see different things.
However, apart from only agreeing with those who share their own viewpoints while ignoring those with diverging ideas, the current electoral system has also strengthened the warped view that the winner takes all. This has created a situation in which only winners have a voice.
However, a democracy monopolized by winners is not a true democracy and a Taiwan only made up of winners is not the whole Taiwan.
This is why civic movements develop rapidly once elections and democracy become more stable.
It is no longer enough to have the right to vote, and a counter reaction to the oppressive public opinion created by the electoral systems is now forming.
Just like Japanese, who have discovered that not all votes are created equal and are debating what to do about the fact that this has hurt the nation’s democracy and human rights, Taiwanese must realize that the only way to be seen and heard is by replacing “voters” with “citizens” and “civil society.”Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant professor of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers