Typhoon Haiyan, a monster storm that hit the Philippines last week, brought death and destruction to Taiwan’s neighbor to the south on an unprecedented scale.
After the typhoon struck, the international community, including Taiwan, sprang into action to provide emergency relief goods, including dried foods, blankets and tents.
Taiwan has experience with major disasters, such as the 921 Earthquake in 1999 and Typhoon Morakot in August 2009, which destroyed whole villages in the south of the nation.
Taiwan knows what it is like to be the victim of natural disasters and was the grateful recipient of foreign assistance in those times.
This is a good opportunity for Taiwan to show that it is a good neighbor to the Philippines, to give generously and provide all the help it can. It is at times like this that people can show their best side by assisting a neighbor in need.
Some of the public may still feel resentment toward the Philippines because of the death of Taiwanese fisherman Hung Shih-cheng (洪石成), who was shot by Philippine Coast Guard personnel in the countries’ overlapping territorial waters earlier this year.
However, that issue was resolved by both sides agreeing to a compromise, and Taiwanese should move on and realize the incredible scale of the disaster that has struck the Philippines.
This is the moment for Taiwan to do everything it can to assist the people in stricken areas of the Philippines.
This is in the longer-term strategic interest of the nation.
The Philippines is, like Taiwan, a free and democratic nation. The two share many values, such as democracy, human rights, freedom of expression and respect for individual freedoms. These values and freedoms do not come automatically: They are threatened every day from within by neglect, as well as by vested economic and political interests.
In contrast, there is China, a country that does not respect those values and freedoms.
China has yet to offer more than meager assistance to the Philippines after the typhoon, while other countries in the region, such as Japan, are providing aid on a much larger scale, commensurate with the intensity of the disaster itself.
In the years to come, Taiwan needs to make sure it stands on the same side as the Philippines and other democracies, such as Japan and South Korea, when facing the threat to its existence as a free and democratic nation posed by China.
Helping the Philippines in its hour of need will cement a bond between future generations of Taiwanese and Filipinos.
Nat Bellocchi served as chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan from 1990 to 1995. The views expressed in this article are his own.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS