KMT and DPP stand for...
Amid the recent influx of foreigners to Taiwan who might be confused about the nation’s political landscape, I offer the following glossary to facilitate understanding of the terms used in the English-language media.
The Chinese Nationalist Party’s acronym “KMT” actually refers to the Kleptofascist Mainland Thieves, and is the party that has dominated Taiwan’s politics for decades under its corrupt rule.
When KMT leaders talk about “reforms,” this means devising new policies to cheat the poor, disenfranchise the disadvantaged and facilitate immoral land-grabs against Formosa’s original inhabitants of thousands of years.
KMT talk of “party solidarity” refers to the fact that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), as KMT chairman, controls the purse strings of the party’s ill-gotten assets following Formosa’s transfer from Japan after World War II, and that under-the-table cash payments to KMT legislators from the “superfund” will abruptly cease unless they continue to ignore their constituents’ wishes and vote according to what the party-state dictates.
On the “green” side of the isle, the Democratic Progressive Party’s acronym “DPP” actually stands for the Decrepit Pensioners Party, a group so inured in their old-school thinking and so out of touch with today’s youth that they cannot manage to propose any meaningful changes in the face of Taiwan’s ever-deteriorating fiscal unsustainability.
It is a total myth that the DPP was ever “in power.” Indeed, during the entire “reign” of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the KMT-dominated legislature consistently blocked dozens of progressive proposals and completely watered down the “sunshine laws” that could have prevented the current scandalst that plague Taiwan today.
Indeed, neither party has any plan whatsoever to create a pragmatic, balanced budget or deal with national debt, which has ballooned by NT$1.72 trillion (US$58.2 billion) under the Ma administration, given the KMT’s flagrant vote-buying pension plan and the complete insolvency of the National Health Insurance scheme.
Not one politician has proposed policies that energize the passion and creativity of the younger population in a way that will allow them to earn the income that will support the demographic of retiring seniors, a fiscal disaster currently playing out in Japan and the US.
Moving on to our “non-country” status, thanks to Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) colossal cock-up back in the 1950s, our quasi-democratic, peace-loving nation is not a member of the UN. Indeed, Taiwan truly is a red-headed stepchild akin to Palestine.
Taiwan needs leaders who can exit the Cold War mentality of the 20th century and enter a sustainable future. With profitable agricultural policies, as the brilliant op-ed writer Du Yu (杜宇) promotes, we can feed our own people and recycle pig shit for both energy and fertilizer.
Taiwan should also be wary of so-called “free-trade” pacts that enslave it to global mega-corporations and stop spending money trying to join the useless and corrupt UN, which has never actually prevented or stopped civil conflict anywhere.
Taiwan needs to leverage its many, many strengths.
Torch Pratt
Yonghe District,
New Taipei City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers