When former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) surprised the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by winning the 2000 presidential election, the KMT decided to turn its back on Taiwan. This was because further democratization spelled the end of the one-party system, and localization the end of further sinicization.
Former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) drove out former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and then, as “elder statesman Lien,” made contact with China, which essentially meant making contact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). He then suited up and went into battle, contesting the 2004 presidential election for the KMT, but again failed to oust the usurper.
Having lost the election, Lien could only continue his contact with Beijing as party chairman, making frequent forays to pay tribute to Beijing on behalf of the KMT. In this way, he was able to trade the ignominy of his defeat for the rapturous welcome he received across the Strait.
When President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won in 2008, former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) became, like Lien, an “honorary chairman” of the party. The two honorary chairmen vied with each other, making frequent trips to China to meet senior CCP officials to discuss Taiwan’s future and the withdrawal of the Republic of China (ROC), while Ma looked on, envious of the attention they received.
At the opening of the Ninth Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Cultural Forum in China, Wu emphasized the duties and accomplishments to cross-strait relations of “this generation” (這一代人), mentioning it on three occasions, and saying how they deserve high praise.
By “this generation,” Wu meant the KMT and CCP, and included the latter to court them and bring them into the fold. By specifying this generation, he implied a comparison between former ROC presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), and former Chinese leaders Mao Zedong (毛澤東), Zhou Enlai (周恩來) and other important figures in the CCP’s struggle with the KMT.
The previous generation fought tooth and nail in China, until the two Chiangs fled to Taiwan, from where they continued their struggle against China’s new leaders. That generation is to be shaken off. Is this new generation of Lien and Wu, with former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), going to be the generation that brings down the ROC? That is what Ma is contemplating.
There were no guarantees the KMT would be able to rule a democratic, progressive Taiwan. Politically, the nation is more advanced than China and there was an opportunity for the exiled ROC government to have a new lease on life. However, the current generation of KMT leaders, late-Chiangs-era politicians such as Lien and Wu, and even future honorary chairman Ma, who had previously indulged in anticommunist slogans, do not seem to be thinking like this. They have forsaken the spirit of the two Chiangs and conspired with China to maintain their grip on power, even if only in a proxy capacity.
Figures such as Lien, Wu and Ma should have been the generation that democratized the KMT and built a new Taiwan. They should have looked to their prodemocracy, non-KMT peers in this country, but from the words Wu used to court his peers in the CCP, it appears they remain supporters of the totalitarian era and of the successors in the CCP.
By saying cross-strait relations are not international relations, they have tied themselves to the CCP and can say this without a hint of shame and with a smile on their faces. Never before have there been more shameless politicians. There is nothing worse than seeing this generation of KMT politicians fawning to the Chinese communists.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past