Mainly associated with conflict resolution, foreign assistance and cozy Scandinavian prosperity, Norway makes an odd target for China’s ire.
Yet for three years, Beijing has frozen relations with Oslo since a committee appointed by the Norwegian parliament awarded the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), deeply embarrassing China’s leaders.
Diplomatic ties have been gutted, meetings canceled and economic ties hamstrung by an unofficial partial embargo on Norwegian salmon and a freeze on trade talks.
The protracted snit shows the lengths Beijing will go to punish other nations for offenses or perceived slights. It is one of several relentless spats China has maintained with countries as varied as Japan and Lithuania that are aimed at winning concessions and discouraging criticism.
China considers such retaliation the best way to draw attention to “issues that they consider core interests that other states do not at first easily grasp,” said Andrew Nathan, an expert on Chinese politics at New York’s Columbia University.
Yet, such fits of pique also come at a price. Maintaining a grudge against Norway over Liu reminds other countries of China’s poor human rights record, while Beijing is seeking to be taken seriously on international stage. China is seen as defining its interests all too narrowly in a way that upsets the usual give-and-take among nations, China academic Joseph Fewsmith of Boston University said.
“I think China hurts its reputation. China needs to think more about providing the public goods that maintain the international system,” Fewsmith said.
The spat with Norway entered the news again this month when the installation of a new Norwegian government offered an opportunity to end the rift. Instead, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying (華春瑩) demanded that Norway take “concrete action to create conditions for improving and developing bilateral relations.”
“Whoever tied the ring around the tiger’s neck must untie it,” she told reporters, using a familiar Chinese expression to apportion blame.
However, China has not said what it wants Norway to do. While the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo by the parliament-appointed committee, the Norwegian government has no direct say in who gets it. At the time of Liu’s award, Beijing bitterly accused Norway of insulting China by interfering in its internal affairs and glorifying a criminal.
Liu was sentenced to 11 years in prison after coauthoring a document calling for sweeping changes to China’s one-party political system. His wife has also been placed under illegal house arrest and his brother-in-law jailed on what supporters say are trumped-up fraud charges.
The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to respond to specific questions about China ties, but spokesman Svein Michelsen said Oslo is hopeful of better relations.
“Norway’s new foreign minister, Mr Borge Brende, has confirmed that re-establishing good relations with China is a key priority and will pursue the available opportunities toward this end,” Michelsen said.
Tsinghua University’s Institute of Modern International Relations dean Yan Xuetong (閻學通) said China expects at least some symbolic act of contrition, although he did not say exactly what form that should take.
“We find it difficult to forgive these foreigners who support [Liu’s] views insulting the Chinese people,” said Yan, whose views closely mirror those of Chinese leaders.
China’s retaliation seeks to exact real economic pain. According to the Norwegian Seafood Council, Norway’s share of China’s salmon market plunged from 92 percent in 2010 to 29 percent in the first half of this year. While the Norwegian salmon industry remains robust, operators are wary of what this portends as China’s appetite for salmon grows.
Along with barriers on Norwegian salmon imports, Beijing has abandoned years-long talks on a bilateral free-trade agreement and excluded Norwegians from visa-free treatment on brief visits to China. In addition, Norwegian businesspeople, journalists and academics have been denied visas for unexplained reasons.
Similarly, economic exchanges with the UK were held up after British Prime Minister David Cameron met last year with exiled Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama, whom China reviles as a separatist. Those exchanges were restored only this month following London’s assurances that Cameron had no further plans to meet the 78-year-old Buddhist cleric.
China also was critical of Lithuania for hosting the Dalai Lama. Many other nations have suffered similarly for angering China over issues involving the Tibetan leader, human rights, territorial disputes and support for Beijing’s rival, Taiwan. Beijing banned Philippine bananas and disinvited Philippine President Benigno Aquino III to a regional trade meeting following a dispute over islands in the South China Sea.
Relations with Japan — always complicated by lingering ill will over World War II — have sunk to new lows since Tokyo last year nationalized the Diaoyutais (釣魚台) known as the Senkakus in Japan, a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea claimed by Taiwan and China.
However, in Beijing’s calculus, not all nations are equal offenders. Although German Chancellor Angela Merkel met with the Dalai Lama in her official office in 2007, Germany is a key economic partner and Beijing issued barely a peep. Beijing also tends to overlook the Dalai Lama’s meetings with US officials in deference to its crucial relationship with Washington.
The lack of a common policy in the West toward China’s trip-line issues allows Beijing broad freedom to react and European states especially are quick to capitalize when a neighbor falls afoul. For example, Norway’s loss in salmon exports has been a boon to other exporters, especially Scotland and the Faroe Islands.
While Beijing punishing Norway offers little risk, some question what China ultimately gains. Chinese leaders appear to have locked themselves into a game of political chicken from which they do not dare back down, said Marc Lanteigne, a China academic at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand.
Beijing may find that other interests outweigh punishing Norway, particularly its desire for economic cooperation in navigating newly ice-free shipping routes in the Arctic and accessing Norwegian expertise in deep-water oil drilling, Lanteigne said.
“I would say that China’s handling of the Nobel Prize affair has accomplished little for Beijing and I think the Chinese government is seeking the best way of breaking the ice, so to speak,” Lanteigne said.
However, so far, Beijing seems to expect Norway to make the first move.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past