Today’s turbulence in emerging economies’ equity markets has triggered a wave of obituaries for their growth miracles of recent decades. However, confusing short-term wobbles with terminal decline is a gross misreading of what is happening. The wave of industrialization and urbanization that is boosting the incomes of millions of people in emerging economies has not run its course.
Emerging market bears are missing an important new driver of continued growth in these countries: their increasingly powerful and dynamic companies. Emerging economies today are much more than a collection of new consumer markets and plentiful — and increasingly skilled — labor. They are also home to thousands of new companies, many of which are quickly becoming large, global leaders in their fields.
Twenty years ago, who would have guessed that Mumbai’s Tata Group would be the largest private-sector industrial employer in the UK; or that Mexican companies Cemex and Bimbo would become the US market leaders in cement production and breadmaking respectively; or that Beijing-based Lenovo would be on a par with Hewlett-Packard as the world’s largest seller of personal computers? Moreover, the transformation in the world’s business landscape is in its early stages and should bolster growth in emerging markets for years to come.
The MGI CompanyScope, a new database of all companies with revenue of US$1 billion or more, shows that there are about 8,000 large companies worldwide, three-quarters of which are still based in developed regions. However, by 2025, there are likely to be an additional 7,000 large companies, with seven out of 10 based in emerging regions. The share of global consolidated revenue generated by these emerging market corporate giants is set to increase from 24 percent today, to 46 percent in 2025.
The composition of the Fortune Global 500 is a case in point. From 1980 to 2000, the share of companies on the list that were based in the emerging world remained relatively flat at 5 percent. By this year, the figure had soared to 26 percent and even taking the most pessimistic assumptions for emerging market growth, we expect it to rise to 39 percent by 2025 and to as high as 50 percent on more bullish assumptions.
The shift in the business landscape so far has lagged behind the shift in the weight of global GDP toward emerging markets. Between now and 2025, the GDP of emerging markets could increase by a factor of 2.5, but the number of large companies based in these regions could more than triple. By 2025, some of the leading global names in many industries could be companies we have not yet heard of and some will likely be based in cities that few today could point to on a map.
We have mapped the MGI CompanyScope to Cityscope, our database of the world’s cities, giving us a detailed picture of where large companies locate their head offices and foreign subsidiaries. Headquarters are extraordinarily concentrated. The top 20 host cities are home to about one-third of all large companies’ headquarters and account for almost half of these companies’ combined revenue. Just five of these top 20 cities are in emerging regions today.
However, this too is changing fast. For example, the number of large companies’ headquarters in Sao Paolo is expected to rise more than threefold by 2025, while Beijing and Istanbul could have 2.5 times as many head offices as they do today. We estimate that about 280 cities — among the candidates are Campinas, Brazil; Daqing, China; and Izmir, Turkey — could host large companies for the first time. More than 150 of these up-and-coming business cities are likely to be in China. If we look at telecoms companies as an example, Bandung, Indonesia, and Hanoi, Vietnam, already host large firms’ headquarters — despite their GDPs being relatively small, at US$6 billion and US$12 billion respectively.
Fast-growing home markets have been the launchpad for globally competitive emerging market companies, partly because these firms have learned to compete at very different income levels. Moreover, they know how to work around inadequate infrastructure. McKinsey’s research suggests that these companies are growing more than twice as quickly as their counterparts in developed economies.
Emerging market large companies’ growing global clout is reflected in flows of foreign direct investment (FDI). As recently as 2001, only 5 percent of outward FDI came from countries outside the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; by 2011, that share had soared to 21 percent. China’s outward FDI rose by almost 50 percent per year from 2004 to 2010, while Brazil, Singapore and Hong Kong have been major investors in Europe.
Those who have been writing obituaries for the emerging market boom should give serious consideration to these trends. The new breed of emerging market multinational is diversifying its revenue around the world. If growth in these companies’ home markets slows, they will diversify even more aggressively. The global economy is now their platform.
Richard Cooper is a professor of international economics at Harvard University. Jaana Remes is a partner at the McKinsey Global Institute, based in San Francisco.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past