China for years has welcomed the world’s trash, creating a roaring business in recycling and livelihoods for tens of thousands. Now authorities are clamping down on an industry that has helped the rich West dispose of its waste, but also added to the degradation of China’s environment.
The Chinese campaign is aimed at enforcing standards for waste imports after Beijing decided too many were unusable or even dangerous and would end up in its landfills. Under the crackdown dubbed Green Fence, China has rejected hundreds of containers of waste it said were contaminated or that improperly mixed different types of scrap.
It is abruptly changing a
multibillion-dollar global industry in which China is a major processing center for the world’s discarded soft-drink bottles, scrap metal, electronics and other materials. Whole villages in China’s southeast are devoted to processing single products, such as electronics. Household workshops break down discarded computers or appliances to recover copper and other metals. Some use crude smelters or burn leftover plastic and other materials, releasing lead and other toxins into the air.
Green Fence is in line with the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) pledges to make the economy cleaner and more efficient after three decades of breakneck growth that fouled rivers and left China’s cities choking on smog.
Brian Conners, who works for a Philadelphia company that recycles discarded refrigerators, says buyers used to visit every week looking for scrap plastic to ship to China for reprocessing. Then Beijing launched its crackdown in February aimed at cleaning up the thriving, but dirty recycling industry.
“Now they’re all gone,” said Conners, president of ARCA Advanced Processing.
US and European recyclers send a significant part of their business to China and say they support higher quality standards. However, stricter scrutiny has slowed imports and raised their costs. The decline in the number of traders buying scrap to ship to China has also depressed prices that US and European recycling companies can get for their plastic and metals.
“While we support Green Fence, it has increased our cost of doing business,” said Mike Biddle, founder of MBA Polymers, a plastics recycler with facilities in California, Europe and southern China.
“It takes longer and there are more inspections,” he added.
At the same time, people in the industry say recyclers that invest in cleaner technology might be rewarded with more business as dirtier competitors are forced out of the market. The crackdown also might create new opportunities to process material in the US and Europe instead of shipping it around the globe.
China’s recycling industry has boomed over the past 20 years. Its manufacturers needed the metal, paper and plastic, and Beijing was willing to tolerate the environmental cost. Millions of tonnes of discarded plastic, computers, electronics, newspapers, and shredded automobiles and appliances are imported every year from the US, Europe and Japan.
However, environmentalists have long complained the industry is poisoning China’s air, water and soil. And Beijing, ever vigilant about possible threats to the legitimacy of one-party rule, now wants to be seen as addressing increased public awareness and concern over pollution.
“The waste recycling system in China really needs to be updated to reduce pollution,” said Lin Xiaozhu (林筱竹), head of the solid waste program for the Chinese group Friends of Nature.
In 2011, recycled scrap supplied about 21 percent of the nearly 90.7 million tonnes of paper used by Chinese industry, according to the state-run newspaper China Daily. It said that resulted in a savings of 16.9 million tonnes of wood.
In Europe, electronics recyclers recover about 1.9 million tonnes of plastic and metal annually and send about 15 to 20 percent of that to China, according to European Electronics Recyclers Association executive secretary Norbert Zonnefeld. Its 40 member companies include electronics manufacturers and copper smelters.
European recyclers welcome China’s tighter enforcement because it will help them comply with EU rules on tracking waste and ensuring it is properly handled, Zonnefeld said. Still, he said, some traders have run into trouble.
“I have heard material has been sent back,” Zonnefeld said. “Of course, they should have known. They were just gambling.”
The US relies even more heavily on China to recycle its waste.
Americans threw away 29 million tonnes of plastic in the form of packaging, appliances, plates and cups last year, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. About 997,900 tonnes were collected for recycling.
About half of plastic soft drink and water bottles collected in the US for recycling are sent to China, according to Kim Holmes, director of recycling for the Society of the Plastics Industry in Washington. She said nearly all plastic from US electronics waste is exported to Asia.
“The export market is a major component of the broader US recycling industry,” Holmes said in an e-mail.
China allows waste shipments to contain no more than 1 percent unrelated material. However, customs officials say some were found to be up to 40 percent unrecyclable trash.
“Some unscrupulous traders, in order to maximize profit, smuggle medical and other waste inside shipments, a direct threat to everyone’s health,” a Shanghai Customs Bureau statement said in April.
Despite a ban on imports of used tires, inspectors intercepted a 104-tonne shipment of them in March, the bureau said. They were labeled “recycled rubber bands.”
ARCA Advanced Processing dismantles about 600,000 refrigerators a year and recovers 72.5 tonnes of plastic a week, plus copper, aluminum and other metals, according to Conners. He said those still are sold to traders who ship much of it to China, but the number who can satisfy Beijing’s requirements to separate and clean waste has plunged.
“There used to be guys who would come to our facility probably once a week to buy our plastic to take back to China,” he said. “That has gone down to where I have two vendors who still are able to do business to get it into China.’’
In a reflection of more stringent controls, customs data show Chinese imports of waste plastic fell 11.3 percent in the first half of this year compared with a year earlier to 3.1 million tonnes, after soaring over the past decade.
MBA Polymer’s facility in Guangzhou, in the heart of China’s manufacturing industry, can process 36,300 tonnes of plastic a year, according to Biddle. It transforms waste into pellets to be used as raw material for new products. Buyers include Chinese manufacturers that work for companies such as computer maker Hewlett-Packard Co and consumer electronics giant Philips NV.
Biddle said he welcomes Green Fence, despite the disruption of imports, because higher standards will favor more responsible companies.
“We’ve had to compete for raw materials with people who treat the materials not in ways that protect workers or the environment,” Biddle said by telephone from California. “I see China moving toward encouraging companies like ours to develop.”
Conners said that by raising the cost of dealing with China, Green Fence might make it profitable for more Western companies to conduct the whole recycling process themselves. He said his company is looking at possible ventures to do that with partners.
“The advantage China had has been reduced considerably. That advantage was low-cost processing,” he said. “This is going to spur investment in the United States to process materials here.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers