When Chinese police beat elderly former professor Sun Wenguang (孫文廣) so badly they broke four ribs, it was just part of the price he has paid for a lifetime defying authority.
The white-haired, soft-spoken Sun first went to prison nearly 50 years ago and is now one of China’s oldest activists, admired by the younger generation for his doggedness.
He turns 80 next month, but still persists in simple acts of protest, dodging minders in a risky game of cat and mouse.
“I am, in their view, a bastard who just won’t stop,” he said, chuckling in, his study late one night after his monitors had left. “If my rights are infringed then I have to fight back. I can’t just give up my rights.”
Sun is kept under regular surveillance by Chinese authorities, with a round-the-clock guard posted at his apartment at sensitive times.
During the trial of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) secretary for Chongqing Bo Xilai (薄熙來) in his home town of Jinan last month, a minder planted himself directly outside the door to prevent it even opening.
It was the sufferings caused by Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) disastrous 1958-1961 Great Leap Forward and 1966-1976 Cultural Revolution that turned Sun, then a university teacher of physics and economics, against the CCP.
Like many he was branded a “counter-revolutionary” and locked in makeshift campus jails.
However, he refused to admit wrongdoing and posted signs at the university entrance defending himself and others being punished.
When one was torn down he would post another, sending him to detention twice more for three years total.
“Whenever I was let out I would write,” he said. “They used to say about me afterward, whoever is down, Sun defends.”
For seven years from 1974 Sun was detained in labor camp and prison after he was convicted of being a counter-revolutionary — giving him more time to ponder the country’s problems.
“How could society be improved, the situation be changed, to avoid producing so much suffering in the future? I couldn’t stop thinking about this,” he said.
“If the nation and society have such huge problems and you only try to solve your own, it won’t work.”
When Sun was released in 1981, China had begun to open up, only to massacre the Tiananmen Square democracy protesters in 1989.
Every year Sun tries to outwit his minders to mark the June 4 Tiananmen anniversary, and the death of then-CCP general secretary Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽) who was ousted after sympathizing with the demonstrators.
It was his attempt to honor Zhao in 2009 that provoked the vicious beating. He sneaked past guards swarming his building and made it to a park before being dragged aside and thrashed.
“Even with lots of people around that didn’t stop them,” he said.
Undeterred, Sun escaped his guards ahead of the Tiananmen anniversary this year by going out for a swim every day until they stopped bothering to follow him.
That freed him to meet friends on an agreed date and quickly unfurl a banner in public.
“Seeing this of the older generation of activists is a huge encouragement,” said Hu Jia (胡佳), a prominent Beijing-based dissident. “Professor Sun — for both his thinking and his actions — is an icon for Chinese dissidents.”
Sun has poured his political views into books criticizing CCP rule and advocating free elections.
His 2002 collected essays were scribbled in jail, some on toilet paper with a reed plucked from his straw bedding and dipped in soy sauce.
After his second book came out in Hong Kong two years later, he was banned from traveling outside China.
He has yet to see his latest work — about his attempts to run for office — after a friend had a copy confiscated while bringing it into the mainland from Hong Kong.
In 2007 and 2011 Sun tried to win a seat on the local legislature, fully aware that the rubberstamp body was not holding genuine elections.
Police tore down his posters and, the second time, banned him from campaigning at his former campus.
Instead he crept in at odd hours to make speeches to whatever students he could find.
Sun belongs to the older school of Chinese activists who directly provoke the authorities with calls for democracy, whereas the less-confrontational newer generation tries to uphold existing laws, Human Rights Watch Asia researcher Maya Wang said.
“He is respected for his long years of activism and the fact that he has persisted in the face of both harassment and physical threats as well as house arrest,” she said. “From his generation it’s very rare to have somebody who continues to do this.”
Sun believes that if more Chinese also press for change, the party will eventually have to bow to democracy — treacherous words in the tightly controlled state.
“Political reform is necessary for the [CCP]... If they don’t do it right then they may not survive,” he said. “The way forward will ultimately be decided not by the party, but by the people.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past