A recent story published by Agence France-Presse about the flip side of Germany’s economic miracle may provide some insight into Taiwan’s labor policymaking as workers in both countries face the same problem of low wages, despite fairly good GDP figures and unemployment rates.
In Europe’s biggest economy, about 3 million workers earn less than 6 euros an hour, making Germany the country with the biggest portion of low-wage workers in Europe. That figure stands in contrast to the country’s impressing 6.8 percent unemployment rate.
Unlike many other countries such as France, the US and Taiwan, Germany has not set a minimum wage, making it difficult to find a solution to the problem.
Employers in France are obliged to pay a minimum wage of 9.50 euros (NT$376) per hour, while US employers must pay US$7.25 (NT$215) per hour to allow workers to have a decent standard of living amid rising costs.
Taiwan’s situation is somewhat different from that in Germany, given the differences in their respective economic structures. However, the problem of low wages in Taiwan is even more acute than in Germany.
Taiwanese employees have staged a series of protests recently requesting higher salaries as they found their wages have not just stagnated, but are decreasing, meaning many are struggling to make ends meet.
In the first four months of the year the nation’s real average monthly income fell to a level last seen 16 years ago at NT$55,062, according to the statistics released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS).
The main purpose of a minimum wage is to ensure that workers can enjoy a basic standard of living. Currently, Taiwan’s system is failing to do this. Workers are finding that they are losing ground in their fight for a raise as the government takes sides with their employers with an eye on keeping the nation’s economy in check.
Taiwanese enterprises rely on foreign low-wage workers to make products and to provide services. Any increase in the minimum wage will mean cost increases. Any increase in cost will harm the businesses that count on selling low-profit-margin products and services to win orders.
Last month, the Council of Labor Affairs conditionally approved a 1.19 percent increase in the monthly minimum wage to NT$19,273 and a 5.5 percent rise in the hourly minimum wage to NT$115, following intensive discussions with representatives from labor unions and employers.
The council also decided to scrap the rule of holding an annual review on minimum wages. Instead, the meeting will only be held when the consumer price index (CPI) increases by 3 percent or more annually.
It is unlikely a meeting will be convened to review the minimum wage in the short term, as the nation’s CPI has been falling. The index shrank 0.79 percent annually last month, bringing inflation up slightly by 0.89 percent in the first eight months of this year, according to the DGBAS.
Relating the minimum wage to CPI may seem reasonable because of higher consumer prices. However, the index is an average figure, indicating the median changes of all major elements. People in the lower-income bracket are more vulnerable to rising prices of food and other daily necessities. What is more, the price hikes of those items usually outpace rises in average consumer prices. That is why people felt the pinch of price hikes in a wide range of basic goods such as electricity, even though the CPI fell.
The government should rethink its wage polices to effectively safeguard the basic standard of living for low-income workers and link minimum wages to the nation’s GDP. It should think more about helping companies expand out of low-margin businesses. Taiwan’s economic growth should not come at the expense of workers’ wages.
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to