Taiwanese residing overseas are yet again being mislabeled as citizens of the People’s Republic of China, with reports emerging this week that their nationality on residency certificates issued by immigration authorities in Norway and South Korea were designated as “Kina [China]-Taiwan” and “China (Taiwan)” respectively.
Officials from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said they have taken up the issue with the Norwegian and South Korean governments, but that both have refused to correct the mistakes, citing an adherence to the “one China” policy.
While such news no doubt infuriates many Taiwanese, there is perhaps a silver lining amid the frustration: Rather than growing numb to the blatant incorrectness, as some have long feared, Taiwanese are taking a stand and making their cases heard.
The case in Norway came to light after a Taiwanese student penned a letter to the op-ed page of the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister paper of the Taipei Times) voicing his “heartache” over his failed attempts requesting the Oslo government to correct the nationality on his residency card. As for South Korea, the Chinese-language Apple Daily ran a report after receiving multiple complaints from netizens over the wrong designation on their residency certificates.
Taiwan is a sovereign nation, with its own government, currency and territory. It elects its own government and negotiates its own treaties. It does not claim to represent China, although China has always sought — incorrectly — to claim Taiwan as part of its territory through incessant international campaigns.
While Taiwan has no control over how other countries choose to kowtow to Beijing, it is encouraging to see Taiwanese refusing to take such absurd notions lying down.
Self-respect gains respect. If Taiwanese do not raise their voices and demand a correction of the misunderstanding regarding their nationality, how can they expect countries, international organizations and the like to be aware that they have committed a mistake?
And even if a majority of the international community do not have the guts to stand up to China’s bullying, it does not mean that Taiwanese should act in the same spineless manner and quietly accept this continuing injustice without uttering a protest.
Silence is certainly not golden in the case of Taiwan’s plight.
While the people of Taiwan deserve applause for raising their voices on their own initiative and striving for due respect, Taiwanese officials’ ambivalence about the distinctions between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are not helping the cause.
After all, how is Taiwan to demand respect from other countries and expect them to address it by its correct name when the government itself commits such errors? Witness the recent controversy over the Taipei City Government’s advertisement at MRT stations, with its reference to China as neidi (內地, “inland”), a loaded term implying that China’s borders extend overseas to Taiwan.
It is cases like this highlighting government officials’ blatant show of disrespect for their own that is sowing confusion and cultivating the misconception among members of the international community that Taiwan is part of China.
Taiwan can fight international injustice — but only when the people and officials alike can raise their collective voice in accord.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if