Deregulation and liberalization have been the focus for markets recently and the Cabinet is once again making a case that reform is necessary for long-term economic development. The government’s problem lies in its poor policy execution and inefficient bureaucracy, leaving it with a string of empty promises.
On Wednesday, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) finalized the government’s third-party payment policies at a Cabinet meeting, allowing non-bank payment processors to provide online transactions on behalf of merchants and consumers. Under the plan, non-banks will be allowed to provide third-party online payment services pursuant to the Act on Issuance and Management of Electronic Monetary Cards (電子票證發行管理條例), with the maximum amount allowed in online stored-value accounts set at NT$10,000 (US$334) each. Businesses offering such services must have at least NT$300 million in paid-in capital.
By the end of the year, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), the Ministry of Economic Affairs and other government agencies will draw up new legislation and management guidelines for e-commerce and third-party payment services.
On Thursday, the Cabinet approved the Council for Economic Planning and Development’s proposal for establishing “free economic pilot zones” in Taiwan. With the planned deregulation in the flow of goods, talent and capital, the government aims to develop intelligent logistics, international medical services and value-added agriculture and industrial innovation centers in Taiwan. Other industries suitable for liberalization that have growth potential, such as financial services, will also be considered for inclusion in the zones in the future. The Cabinet’s next step is to enact a special law governing the zones, which will include large-scale deregulation measures and tax incentives, pending legislative approval.
In view of the underdeveloped service sector, the slow progress in industrial transformation and a lackluster track record in attracting foreign investment, the Cabinet’s plans for third-party payment services and pilot zones show policymakers’ desire to stimulate economic growth. The government has removed roadblocks to pursue the development and competitiveness of domestic financial services and electronic commerce providers through a partial Cabinet reshuffle, especially the removal of former FSC chairman Chen Yuh-chang (陳裕璋), who had been at odds with economy and technology officials over several issues.
As promising as the government’s plans are, proper execution of the plans remains a challenge. The government has not divulged much information about the contents of its policies, nor the operational conditions and complementary measures for companies. Businesses are wondering whether the government’s policies and the scope of deregulation are viable — that is, whether the Cabinet’s plans make sense.
There are complaints from e-commerce businesses that the ceiling of NT$10,000 for individual online stored-value accounts is too low. Also, there are worries that the pilot zones plan will be a privilege only a few businesses can enjoy, rather than being a platform allowing companies to upgrade their operations to provide high-end services on a level playing field.
It is understandable that the government aims to further the nation’s development through deregulation and liberalization at a time when the global and domestic economies remain weak. Taiwan does need reform policies and visionary plans to revitalize itself, but it also demands a government with more efficient civil servants, less red tape and a strong ability to implement policy.
A survey released by the German Trade Office Taipei last month warned that Taiwan is losing its competitive edge to China in terms of business friendliness and government efficiency. Personnel recruitment is posing the biggest challenge. Before the Cabinet can confidently voice optimism about its plans, it must solve its bureaucratic inefficiency.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US