Some people believe the Republic of China is in a pre-revolutionary state. Although many scoff at this idea, saying that the nation’s democracy is in a good place, with a stable society and functioning economy, they may have to re-evaluate their position after Saturday, when more than 200,000 people descended upon Taipei’s Ketagalan Boulevard to protest the death of army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘).
These protesters were not mobilized by advertisements in newspapers or on TV, and no political party was behind the demonstration. It was a relatively unknown activist group called Citizen 1985 that organized the white T-shirt vigil for Hung in front of the Presidential Office and managed to get hundreds of thousands of people to attend. The demonstrators sat in the street in an orderly manner and dispersed calmly once the event was over, having expressed their dissatisfaction with the authorities and those responsible for Hung’s death.
The silver cross that the protesters formed on the intersection at the East Gate at the base of the boulevard symbolized that mass movements are now at an important turning point and that the demonstration could have a huge impact on society.
In the past, significant mass movements were instigated by political parties, but this time, the demonstration was organized by a group of young people who prefer to maintain a low profile. All that opposition party leaders did was to sit down and listen to young people speak, reflecting the waning importance of political parties in orchestrating social movements.
In the past, it was always political figures who led the public onto the streets, but now average people with no expressed political affiliation are starting to raise their voices. Famous directors and actors, such as Giddens Ko (九把刀), Leon Dai (戴立忍) and Ko I-chen (柯一正), have taken the lead in several recent protests against the forced demolitions of the Wenlin Yuan (文林苑) urban renewal project, the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Gongliao District (貢寮) and the demolitions of four homes in Miaoli County’s Dapu Borough (大埔).
Citizens are increasingly crowding out politicians in social initiatives. “People power” is on the rise and individuals are asserting themselves, from the daughter of fisherman Hung Shih-cheng (洪石城) to Hung Chung-chiu’s sister, whose succinct responses have put the gabbling, self-important TV anchors interviewing them to shame.
The way in which Jang Show-ling (鄭秀玲), chairperson of the National Taiwan University economics department, challenged the cross-strait service trade pact, applying pressure on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was even more remarkable, especially in contrast to the stances taken by her colleagues.
The traditional mass media is slowly losing its monopoly on the ability to mobilize the public and is being replaced by the Internet.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government may still be complacent about the situation, thinking society is stable, but it would do to well to remember that the protests in Turkey were sparked by a simple park redevelopment plan, or that the recent rioting in Brazil was ignited by bus fare increases.
Deaf to what the public tries to tell it and abusing its power, the Ma administration has angered people over development projects like those in Dapu and Wenlin Yuan.
Blind to the people struggling to make ends meet, it forced through the signing of the service trade pact.
Indifferent to people’s health and safety, it insists on getting the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant operational, even though the facility has already failed many safety checks.
If the government does not see the error of its ways, listen to the public and amend its policies, the government could have a revolution on its hands.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with