The process of negotiations surrounding the cross-strait service trade agreement was handled behind closed doors and its contents were not revealed until just before the signing of the agreement. The result has been a strong public backlash and with reference to Taiwan’s anemic economy, many people have described the agreement as the straw that will break the camel’s back.
The Taiwanese government took steps to ease regulations governing investments in China by Taiwanese manufacturers, which undermined the domestic industry and led to rising unemployment, falling salaries and a widening wealth gap. This threw the Taiwanese economy into crisis.
The signing of the service trade deal is going to make things even worse. If ratified, it would not only create a new wave of capital outflow, it would also leave the door to the Taiwanese market wide open. Chinese enterprises bringing in cheap Chinese goods — the next agreement to be signed is to be a goods trade agreement — other inferior products and cheap labor will dominate the market and squeeze out small and medium-sized Taiwanese companies from the service sector.
Domestic demand is limited, and more competition would only bring with it vicious price-cutting and downward pressures on quality. The majority of Chinese businesses are owned or controlled by the state, and even the chairpersons of listed companies are appointed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). These firms do not focus on efficiency like many private companies do and they are ready to slash prices simply to boost their market share. Taiwanese companies may not be able to resist such tactics, and in the end, this will lead to a reshuffling of the nation’s service sector. There will be a new boss in town.
From being small-business owners, Taiwanese would become employees of Chinese companies. This is the truth that lies behind the government’s deregulation of Chinese investments despite the desire to create employment opportunities.
Even more frightening is that the service trade agreement could be a shortcut for the many Chinese that want to move to Taiwan. It completely ignores Taiwan’s needs, there are no professional restrictions and the capital threshold is low. This could lead to the biggest influx since the Nationalist government fled to Taiwan in 1949.
While the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) opposed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), many people took it all too lightly and believed President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) honeyed words and even thought that Beijing would offer Taiwan some advantages. Time has shown that there were no advantages to be had and that there were no guarantees for Taiwanese businesspeople investing in China under the deal.
The same applies to the service industry, as can be seen by the cases of the Shin Kong department store in Beijing and the SOGO department store in Chengdu. Since Taiwanese have already tasted the bitter fruits of the ECFA, why would they fall for the same trick again? Why would they let Ma walk all over them again?
The service trade deal is an unequal agreement. The scope of the Taiwanese and the Chinese economies are not on a par: the Taiwanese economy is free, while the Chinese is a planned economy in which the state controls the vast majority of companies. This is why ostensibly mutual deregulation in reality means unilateral Taiwanese deregulation. Chinese businesses may enter Taiwan without any restrictions at all, while Taiwanese companies that want to enter China are faced with layer after layer of obstacles.
The signing of this unequal pact is evidence that the corruption and muddleheadedness of the Ma administration exceeds even that of the Qing Dynasty’s final years. A century ago, Qing Dynasty subjects understood that they had to rebel and overturn the dynasty.
Taiwan is now a democracy, so how can people continue to accept the corruption and muddleheadedness of Ma and his government? How can Taiwanese let Ma sell Taiwan out to the CCP, and their freedom to a dictator? The service trade agreement is a new version of the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki [under which China ceded Taiwan to Japan] and the people of Taiwan must not be sold off again.
This is a matter of life or death that transcends the blue-green divide. The TSU calls on all Taiwanese to stand up and be counted, to stop the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the CCP from selling the people of Taiwan down the river and to exert pressure on KMT legislators to resist being manipulated by Ma.
The TSU will join hands with all legislators from opposition parties in a legislative scorched earth tactic. We will refuse to budge a single step and we will recapture the right of Taiwanese to be their own masters.
Huang Kun-huei is the chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if
Midday in Manhattan on Wednesday, September 16, was sunny and mild. Even with the pandemic’s “social distancing” it was a perfect day for “al fresco” dining with linen tablecloths and sidewalk potted palms outside one of New York City’s elegant restaurants. Two members of the press, outfitted with digital SLR cameras and voice recorders, were dispatched by The Associated Press to cover a rare outdoor diplomatic meeting on one of these New York streets. American diplomat Kelly Craft, Chief of the United States Mission to the United Nations, lunched in the open air with Taiwan’s ambassador-ranked representative in New York, James