The starch scandal that sparked the latest food scare in the nation has opened a Pandora’s box of toxic evils. Industrial colorings have since been found in bean curd, while thousands of zongzi (粽子, glutinous rice dumplings) were pulled off shelves last week after two manufacturers allegedly altered expiration dates.
It is the second major food scare in two years.
When plasticizer — a chemical additive to make food more pliable — was found in 2011 in food and beverages, public awareness of food safety was raised and the government promised to enhance food safety standards with an amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品藥物管理法).
Yet, both the public and the government seem to be forgetful. People eat and drink without being cautious about food safety, and the proposed amendment remained stuck in the legislature until the last day of the legislative session on May 31, when lawmakers quickly passed it.
Apart from public health risks, the toxic starch scandal has damaged the nation’s culinary reputation and damaged businesses at night markets. The industrial starch was found in mostly traditional Taiwanese food and drink, such as tapioca pearls in bubble tea, gluttonous dumplings, Hakka rice noodles, oyster omelets and sweet taro balls.
These street foods are popular with locals and foreign tourists alike. Bubble tea, which is made with chewy tapioca balls and milk tea, even put Taiwan on the world culinary map and created a sensation not only in Japan and South Korea, but even in the West. Bubble tea shops can now be found in Berlin, London and Paris.
Yet since last month, Singapore and Malaysia have imposed bans on tapioca balls and several other food items imported from Taiwan. Travel agencies have also expressed concerns over the safety of street food, fearing that it could affect tourists visiting night markets, one of the nation’s most popular tourist attractions.
Health authorities and the public cannot be forgetful again. The toxic starch scandal has damaged the nation’s international credibility in food safety.
The government must take heed and implement stricter regulations governing food safety. As the recently passed amendment to the act states, domestic food manufacturers should establish a tracking system tracing the flow of the production and trade, including supply sources and buyers, and there needs to be mandatory registration of certain food businesses beyond a certain scale.
The amendment also seeks to deter food manufacturers from using illegal additives by raising the penalties to a maximum of NT$15 million (US$499,000). However, fines alone cannot prevent the use of cheap industrial chemicals in food items. Proactive food inspections must be carried out to ensure consumer safety.
For the public, the industrial starch incident is a sharp reminder that consumers also have a role to play in food safety. They should say no to problematic food products and, in this way, force manufacturers that ignore safety standards out of business.
Manufacturers and food vendors must also be more cautious about the ingredients they purchase from suppliers.
Ensuring food safety is everyone’s business, and it will require a collective effort by the public and private sectors to rebuild the nation’s reputation.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS