The 66th session of the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decisionmaking body of the WHO, ended on May 28 after a busy eight-day agenda.
It was the fifth time that Taiwan participated, though the Taiwanese delegation attracted little attention from the media because there were no new issues.
Nevertheless, a discussion of how the Taiwanese delegates should use the term “Chinese Taipei” with more caution would be useful.
Due to diplomatic realities, the use of the title “Taiwan” at such international events always results in demands that it be changed to something like “Chinese Taipei.”
In addition, any word with a meaning that implies “country” or “nation” in written documents must also be changed.
For example, the term “National Health Insurance” had to be changed to “Universal Health Insurance” because the use of the word “National” was not acceptable.
Furthermore, there is a requirement for the speech manuscripts of the Taiwanese delegates be submitted for advance review to the WHA Secretariat. Any breaches are to be picked up by the Secretariat’s legal consultants.
As a matter of fact, since “Chinese Taipei” is a term that clearly denigrates the country, its use should be avoided as far as possible.
By using it, the international community will continue to believe that Taiwanese are comfortable with the term.
This would make it even harder to get rid of the term in the future.
There are two common approaches in response to an unfavorable situation: to act by “commission” or by “omission.”
Although it is impossible for Taiwan to act by commission and use the name “Republic of China” at international events, it should at least act by omission.
That is, since Taiwan is not allowed to use the name “Republic of China,” it should do all it can to avoid the use of the term “Chinese Taipei.”
When necessary, Taiwan could even intentionally leave sentences incomplete to highlight the fact that it is protesting by act of omission.
Therefore, I suggest that Taiwanese delegates only use the term “Chinese Taipei” at the beginning of an address to let people know where he or she is from, but then avoid any further use of the term throughout the remainder of the address.
Taiwanese are polite by nature, so delegates always start their address by saying that “Chinese Taipei appreciates that the Secretariat gives us the opportunity to speak.”
Coming from a member state, such a remark is appropriate and courteous at international events.
However, for Taiwan, which is participating as an observer on humiliating terms, the same phrase is undignified and a loss of face.
Hence, Taiwanese delegates need only say “Chinese Taipei speaks,” without any expression of appreciation.
When they talk about how the nation will co-operate with the WHA in their speeches, they should of course use the word “we” in place of “Chinese Taipei.”
Former British prime minister Winston Churchill once encouraged the British people, saying that, “In war: resolution. In defeat: defiance. In victory: magnanimity. In peace: goodwill.”
At an international event such as the WHA, what Taiwanese need is defiance, not politeness.
Michael Chen is chairman of the Taiwanese Association for Social Welfare, and a member of the Taiwanese delegation to the 66th session of the World Health Assembly.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US