One would think that the judiciary, having come under much criticism for a perceived lack of impartiality, would work to restore the public’s dwindling confidence. However, it has continued to amaze the public with its blatant bias.
On Friday, Cho Po-chung (卓伯仲), the younger brother of Changhua County Commissioner Cho Po-yuan (卓伯源), was charged with colluding with business groups to illegally pocket NT$49 million (US$1.6 million) in the county government’s procurement of environmentally friendly shopping bags.
As the indictment also charged Cho Po-chung with embezzling NT$24 million from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) presidential campaign office during last year’s presidential election, suggesting that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might not have been honest in submitting its declaration of funds received during Ma’s election campaign.
According to the report published by the Control Yuan in July last year, Ma and Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) of the KMT received NT$446 million in donations in the presidential election last year. The expenditure for the Ma-Wu ticket was NT$444 million, with the final balance standing at NT$2.2 million, the report said.
The Ma-Wu ticket won the election against then-Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her running mate, Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全), who declared with the Control Yuan that their fundraising campaign had raised NT$756 million.
The Political Donations Act (政治獻金法) clearly stipulates that candidates are required to report all campaign spending.
However, Ying Pao-kuo (應寶國), the accountant of the Ma-Wu ticket’s national campaign headquarters at the time, was quoted in Cho Po-chung’s indictment as saying that “among the receipts filed by its Changhua campaign office, some, given their large amount, were not reported to the Control Yuan.”
The indictment said that 1,300 sets of plates were distributed as campaign memorabilia during the campaign period, each costing NT$91 — an amount that runs against the Ministry of Justice’s regulation that campaign paraphernalia cannot exceed a price tag of NT$30. NT$30 was also the standard by which the ministry dispatched prosecutors nationwide to probe for vote-buy allegations.
This seems to suggest that the Ma-Wu ticket’s Changhua campaign office might have violated the Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act (總統副總統選舉罷免法), yet the public has yet to hear from the Control Yuan or judicial agencies about probing the case involving Ma.
In contrast to the apparent inaction of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division (SID) and agencies to investigate the seeming inconsistencies, the public, meanwhile, is bewildered by the judiciary’s skewed sense of justice after it was reported that three Taiwan Solidarity Union officials have been indicted for contempt of authority for calling the SID “SID pigs” during a protest in May last year.
These incidents give the public a pathetic impression. Prosecutors respond to criticism of negligence by charging the accusers with “contempt of authority,” while not a word is uttered about clues that may lead to bigger cases involving the top echelon of the KMT.
This brazen double standard is downright despicable, and a growing number of Taiwanese fear that an Internet joke that “you will be all right [and avoid any judiciary prosecution] as long as you possess a KMT membership” may have started ringing true.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS