The fatal shooting of a crewman on a fishing boat that set sail from Taiwan’s Siaoliouciou (小琉球) by Philippine Coast Guard personnel remains a topic of heated discussion across Taiwan.
This is not the first dispute that Taiwan has had with the Philippines over fishing rights in waters south of Taiwan. Overfishing and exploitation of marine resources over many years have plunged fishing grounds far and near into an ecological crisis, making life hard for Taiwanese fishermen. The death of crewman Hung Shih-cheng (洪石成) in the incident raises questions about what role the governments of Taiwan and the Philippines have been playing in all this.
The unfortunate incident has given President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) unpopular government an opportunity to intensify the conflict in the name of national sovereignty, imposing a list of 11 sanctions on the Philippines. As to the government of Philippine President Benigno Aquino III, its handling of the incident has been inconsistent as it muddles through the crisis. As the two governments exchange accusations, the issues that ordinary people really care about, like punishing those responsible, investigating the truth of the incident and working out how to develop fisheries while safeguarding the ecology of the seas south of Taiwan, are being drowned out by rhetoric about national sovereignty. These issues are displaced by misplaced nationalism and will eventually to be set aside and forgotten.
For the past few days, every TV broadcast on the issue seems to feature the government and the pan-blue and pan-green political camps speaking in unison about the need to uphold Taiwan’s national dignity, while giving the media free rein to stir up animosity against the Philippines.
Only more recently have they started urging Taiwanese not to take out their anger on Philippine nationals in Taiwan.
Following the government’s lead, some hotheads have called for war, while others have called for a boycott of Philippine products. There have even been newspaper reports of attacks against innocent Philippine migrant workers.
Taiwan’s attention-grabbing media have broadcast footage of entertainers making sarcastic comments about how poorly governed the Philippines is, while program hosts describe the Philippine government in vulgar terms.
All of a sudden, everyone has noticed that several Philippine politicians and officials who had been involved in corruption scandals reappeared on the Philippine political stage during mid-term elections that were marred by numerous violent incidents and suspicious power cuts.
In the minds of many Taiwanese, all this goes to show what a “rotten” country the Philippines is.
However, even if all these accusations were true, should Taiwanese not offer sympathy to the people who have to live under such a government? Philippine migrant workers are ordinary working people, just like the fisherman who was killed. Nationalist emotions cannot bring Hung back to life, just as they cannot solve the hardship or improve the fates of Philippine migrants or any other working people.
As the government and media stir up anti-Philippine sentiment, exposing the muddle-headed populism of media in Taiwan, the National Communications Commission has merely submitted to this tide of nationalism and has done nothing to rectify the media’s behavior. If this situation continues, even more regrettable incidents may continue to happen.
Nationalism casts a powerful spell. It sets “the nation” above everything else, allowing politicians to focus the public’s will on asserting what they portray as the nation’s dignity and the national interest. Whenever a country faces a crisis of domestic policy, the nationalist strategy since time immemorial is to find a scapegoat and declare war to unify the country in hatred against a common enemy.
The war that the US launched against Iraq just 10 years ago is a recent example and a lesson that should be heeded.
Nationalistic sentiments are inducing Taiwanese to forgo their planned trips to the Philippines and have convinced shops to stop selling products from the Philippines. Politicians have their own motives for letting such things happen, but what good does any of this do for ordinary people? How will it make people’s lives any better?
The Ma administration has been making a lot of noise about the current dispute. No doubt, its posturing is based on delusional self-importance and a haughty disdain for the Philippines. However, the reality is that Taiwan has been treading water for a long time and has fallen far behind international trends.
This shouting match is probably not going to quiet down for a while yet. Progressive forces in Taiwan must make their voices heard, so that Taiwanese will not unwittingly dance along to the politicians’ tune. It would be better if Taiwanese used this opportunity to learn more about the country from which many of the nation’s migrant workers come, and about what kind of a life people live in the Philippines. Above all, the lesson that people from both countries really need to learn is how not to let politicians lead them by the nose.
Lorna Kung is spokesperson for the Union of Excluded Immigrants and Unwanted Citizens.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past