The government will soon have to consider an amendment that would block Internet users’ access to foreign Web sites that contain unauthorized content or infringements on the intellectual property of copyright holders. However, netizens, experts and lawmakers are concerned that the legislation might threaten Internet freedom and Internet-led innovation.
On Tuesday last week, the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Intellectual Property Office (IPO) announced it was proposing an amendment to the Copyright Act (著作權法) that would allow the government to demand that local Internet service providers (ISPs) help block copyright infringement from content on foreign Web sites.
According to IPO Director-General Wang Mei-hua (王美花), the legislation would give the government the power to require local ISPs to blacklist Web sites deemed undesirable by identifying their Internet protocol addresses. It would also give the government the authority to request that ISPs disable access to suspicious sites through a technology known as domain name service blocking, essentially rendering the sites unusable.
The amendment, which the IPO plans to send to the legislature for review in the next session and which could come into effect next year if it is approved, comes amid continued complaints from copyright holders that movies and music are available for download through file transfer protocol, peer-to-peer methods or BitTorrent file-sharing services, before they are even officially released in Taiwan.
However, the IPO’s plan has raised concern among the public that it would give the government the power to control and censor the Web. Netizens have also questioned why the government has not tackled online piracy via judicial cooperation with foreign governments, higher penalties for copyright infringement or easier legal procedures for seeking compensation, but instead has resorted to the lazy option of regulating the Internet for domestic users.
On Friday, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said she was worried about the IPO’s move, fearing that giving the government the authority to block access to specific sites would “open a Pandora’s box” of increased government intervention on the Internet. She likened the plan to the establishment of something very similar to China’s abandoned Internet filtering “Green Dam” project in Taiwan, saying that the government must invite Web companies and Internet users to discuss the issue first, before sending the draft amendment to the legislature.
Although the notion to help curb online piracy and protect intellectual property rights is well-intended, the amendment to the Copyright Act must account for the public’s concern about using political power to restrain Internet-based communications and innovation. The IPO has said that there are several countries mulling controls on the Internet to safeguard the rights of copyright holders and content users. Equally, it must tell the public about any potential consequences of the proposed amendment and how it would affect the openness of the Internet and the rights of users.
At this point, it is anyone’s guess how exactly the amendment will impact online development in Taiwan. However, what is sure is that it will expand the power of the government to regulate the Internet and open the door for the government to further censor the Web, either because of pressure from copyright holders or because it chooses to do so. This issue needs to be addressed with extreme caution and the passage of legislation should not be rushed.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95