Neither Taiwan nor the Philippines have been willing to compromise over their overlapping demands for their respective special economic zones in the South China Sea. The result has been that the Philippines’ coast guard has been increasing its patrols in the overlapping areas in recent years.
It is well known that they confiscate Taiwanese fishing boats and arrest their crewmembers if they enter the area, and only release them upon the payment of very large fines. Over the past 13 years, there have been 31 reported cases of Philippine government vessels harassing Taiwanese fishing boats.
Nine of those incident have developed into major clashes and caused two deaths and one severe injury, and more than 30 Taiwanese crewmembers have been detained by Philippine authorities for between two months and one-and-a-half years.
Taiwanese authorities have not been able to come up with an effective solution to this issue, and they are instead demanding that fishermen do their best to avoid the disputed areas. No one understands the tragedy of the situation better than Taiwanese fishermen and their families, and it is a long time since they were happy to set out to sea.
Taiwanese fishermen risk their lives entering the disputed areas because Taiwan’s coastal and offshore fishing grounds are becoming depleted, making it difficult for fishermen to catch the kinds of fish that provide high economic returns. This, in combination with the increased fuel and electricity prices, fishermen’s wages and fishing access fees, has forced Taiwanese fishermen to move into areas closer to the territorial waters of other countries to be able to make ends meet.
If the government really is unable to protect fishermen, it should work to restore fishery resources in Taiwan’s coastal waters so our fishermen can go safely about their business in Taiwanese waters.
Apart from encouraging fishermen to suspend their fishing activities and take up other professions in an attempt to streamline the fishing industry, the government should also determine periods when fishing should be suspended, create protected fishing areas and set specifications for fishing nets and other fishing tools so the fishery resources that are still restorable are allowed a period during which they can be rehabilitated.
The government should also create artificial reefs, release bred fry in the sea and establish sea farms in order to increase fishing resources in coastal and offshore waters.
The Japanese government has issued clear regulations stating that producers in the fishing industry always must be the main target during the process of implementing the protection and management of aquatic resources, and that marine protection must be given priority over development and utilization.
The results of these regulations have been outstanding.
Taiwan’s system for protecting and managing aquatic resources mainly relies on government departments for management. Because the laws and systems regulating the fishing industry are not complete, the government has not been very effective when it comes to restoring aquatic resources.
The government must actively push for adequate resource management within the fishing industry that allows industry participants themselves set up organizations to manage their industry so that they can rely on resource management measures introduced by these organizations to implement resource management and a stable and smoothly operating fishing industry.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on