The opaque nature of China’s government makes it difficult to see where Chinese economic policy is heading, and thus how the country’s economy will develop in the years ahead. However, the scale of China’s economy and its role in global trade and financial markets compel us to try to understand the intentions of China’s new leadership.
A useful starting point is to examine the key appointments that have been made since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) assumed office.
One surprise was the decision to retain Zhou Xiaochuan (周小川) as governor of the People’s Bank of China. Zhou had come to the end of his term — and had reached an age at which officials are supposed to retire. So the decision to keep him on for at least the next two years represents a significant endorsement by the new leadership.
Zhou is an intelligent and internationally respected expert on monetary policy and finance. As the head of the national bank, he has favored more market-based monetary policies and increased internationalization of China’s currency, the renminbi.
He has also worked successfully to contain inflationary pressures. We can expect more of the same in the coming years.
Chinese Minister of Finance Lou Jiwei (樓繼偉) comes to the ministry from the China Investment Corp, China’s sovereign wealth fund, where he dealt with global capital markets on a daily basis.
Lou, a trained economist who previously served in the Ministry of Finance as a deputy minister, where he was a voice for pro-market reforms, indicated his current approach to tax and budget policy at a recent meeting in Beijing. He rejected what he described as the European style of very large government and high tax rates and the US style of lower tax rates, but large fiscal deficits, in favor of low budget deficits and a tax system that would promote “opportunities” for individuals and private enterprises.
Xi and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) obviously knew what they were getting when they appointed Lou. And, despite his age, they promised that he would have a full five years as finance minister, which would push his tenure past the normal retirement age.
Liu He (劉鶴) is perhaps the least visible of the key economic thinkers. Liu played an important role in shaping the recently adopted 12th Five-Year Plan, with its emphasis on urbanization and service-sector development as a means to increase personal incomes and the share of consumer spending in GDP.
He has recently been promoted to the post of deputy director of China’s National Development and Reform Commission, the principal body that advises the State Council on economic-development strategy and macroeconomic policy.
Taken together, these appointments demonstrate the new Chinese leadership’s emphasis on pro-market reforms and a shift from heavy industry to greater reliance on consumption and services.
That shift is likely to mean a slower rate of GDP growth than the annual rate of nearly 10 percent that China achieved during the last three decades. However, a slowdown to 7 percent annual growth would still double China’s GDP over the next decade.
More consumption and less heavy industry will also reduce China’s demand for raw materials, dampening global commodity prices. Even more significant, shifting income from state-owned enterprises to middle-class workers and increasing consumer spending will reduce China’s enormous savings rate.
Since a country’s current-account surplus is the difference between its national saving and its national investment, China’s current-account surplus is likely to continue to shrink in the coming years.
That is consistent with the Five-Year Plan’s goal of basing GDP growth more on domestic demand and less on exports.
Since China’s external surplus is already down to less than 2 percent of GDP, a decline in domestic saving could result in China beginning to run a current-account deficit. In that case, China would no longer be a net buyer of foreign bonds and other assets.
If China wanted to continue to invest in foreign businesses and natural resources, it would have to become a net seller of bonds from its portfolio.
Of course, the new leadership will face serious obstacles as it tries to shift policy in these market-friendly directions. China’s state-owned enterprises are powerful forces in the economy, with substantial political influence; they will resist the shift from heavy industry to services.
Likewise, the widespread and official recognition of corruption introduces a new source of uncertainty into national and local politics.
However, China’s new leaders have signaled where they want the economy to go and have emphasized their determination to reduce corruption. Most important, they have put talented people in charge of the process.
The rest of the world should hope that they succeed.
Martin Feldstein is a professor of economics at Harvard University and president emeritus of the National Bureau of Economic Research. He chaired former US president Ronald Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers between 1982 and 1984.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under