Like many couples, Tom Wang and his wife met online. On their first date, in a tea house, he admired her femininity. They married a year later and are now negotiating the decor of their new apartment.
Wang hopes they will grow old together, yet refused to pay for her wedding ring and is wary of having a child.
“I have a headache when I talk about that,” said the 40-year-old software engineer, with a half-smile.
His wife is not family; not even a friend, he said — merely a partner in their joint endeavor. He is gay, she lesbian. The marriage is a facade to satisfy their parents and protect their careers.
Though homosexuality was illegal in China until 1997, and remains a sensitive issue, the country does not have the deep-rooted, vicious homophobia of many other places. For most of its history, it “not only tolerated male same-sex love but also celebrated it”, writes Richard Burger in Behind the Red Door, a history of sex in China.
However, such relationships supplemented marriage rather than replaced it.
According to the tenets of traditional society, the worst unfilial behavior is failing to continue the family line. Even now, the pressure to marry and have children is intense.
Zhang Beichuan (張北川), an expert on homosexuality at Qingdao University, believes about 80 percent of gay men and lesbians marry.
Most wed straight partners unaware of their spouses’ sexuality. Others, such as Wang, find a homosexual partner of the opposite sex by asking friends or advertising online.
One woman in her early twenties writes on one such Web site: “I have promised my parents I will marry by 2014 ... I am looking for someone who is simple, honest, has an apartment, does not want a child. We won’t disturb each other. The marriage will last at least five years.”
Another says she and her girlfriend are out to their parents, but want a baby. As an openly lesbian couple they would face social stigma; birth control policies also make life harder for single mothers.
“I want to find someone who is healthy, not bad looking, intelligent, kind and cheerful,” she says. “You don’t need to raise the kid, but I hope you are a father who will love the kid.”
Wang (not his real name) spent five years seeking a bride. For men, the pressure to marry starts in their early thirties, he said; for women, much earlier. His wife, almost a decade younger, also wanted to allay her parents’ suspicion after they reacted angrily to her attempts to come out.
Wang bought time by telling his family that Shanghai girls would not look at him until he had an apartment. His sister asked if he had physical problems.
“My parents are from the countryside. Everyone compares themselves with each other, especially about their children,” he said. “It was a big deal that I went to university in the city and got a good job — so why couldn’t such a great guy find a wife and have children?”
Even in the city, being openly gay could harm you at work, he says. Simply being single is a problem.
“I work for a foreign company so it’s not so bad, because they respect personal privacy, but they still want you to take your girlfriend or wife to company events. If you are single, people think you’re weird. They feel you are more responsible and mature after you marry. They also feel you have a family to feed so maybe they should give you a chance,” he said.
Thanks to such pressures, as many as 12 million gay men are married to straight women, estimates Xing Fei, of the Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences.
Wang said he never considered that option.
“I know if a woman loved me, I couldn’t give her the love she would expect. For a woman, that’s tragic,” he said.
Xing said others wanted to avoid a straight partner’s sexual demands.
However, marriages of convenience bring their own difficulties.
“Some of these marriages are good — they can help and support each other — but most don’t last long,” Zhang said.
Couples may agree in advance to an early divorce. Others find cohabiting and sharing family duties harder than expected. Splitting up can bring disputes over children and property.
In Wang’s case, their property is registered in their own names. They have also covered every detail they could think of — he will pay all travel costs for visiting his parents, for example. They will have separate rooms, but share a bed when his family comes to stay. They will not give a key to her parents, who live nearby, lest they pop in unexpectedly.
“I’m really lucky to find her, and she’s a generous person,” Wang said of his wife.
His boyfriend reluctantly accepted the situation.
“But there will be more problems. With love you can put up with a lot. Without love, it’s harder,” Wang said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US