The Control Yuan was smart enough to realize that a report by Control Yuan members Chou Yang-shan (周陽山) and Lee Ping-nan (李炳南) on the 228 Incident was likely to prove unpopular, so it pulled the report from its Web site one day after it was made public.
However, it was dumb enough to not realize beforehand that what Shih Hsin University adjunct assistant professor Chi Chia-lin (戚嘉林) was quoted as saying in the report — that former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) may be the illegitimate son of a Japanese man — would enrage the public.
Worse yet, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien was quick to defend the comments — which were unrelated to the 228 Massacre — saying that Lee deserved the treatment because the former president was a “bad person.”
It is not the first time that Wang has made such derogatory comments — he once said that Han people are smarter than Aborigines. Nor was it unusual to see such comments or attitudes directed at specific politicians in Taiwan simply because of the hatred some people have for others’ bloodline or ethnicity.
Former government official Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) stirred up controversy when he called himself a “high-class Mainlander” and made several racist comments in his articles. Then-presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said in 2007 that he would treat Aborigines as human beings, “and I will educate you well,” if they moved to the city.
Instances of spiteful behavior have included Lee Teng-hui being accused of having communist sympathies and attacks on Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) when both served as president, and some people even threw a shoe at Ma just months ago.
While the public has long been aware of the red line of hate politics, such as calling someone a “Mainlander pig” or making the Nazi salute, incidents and comments like these keep cropping up.
Hatred against specific groups based on their bloodline and ethnicity is a global phenomenon, influenced by history, culture, society, religion and other factors. Efforts to eliminate hatred and hate speech, which by now have been recognized by the majority of people as toxic, have been ongoing for thousands of years, but remain an unfulfilled goal.
Racist or hateful speech uttered by elected or appointed government officials is more dangerous than similar statements by members of the public. Empowered with administrative authority, government officials are able to persecute and discredit groups of people and set a bad example to the public.
Government officials should not only refrain from making any comment or move that could divide the nation, but should also discourage and condemn such actions. The same applies to political parties, politicians and celebrities.
Failure to do so would likely contribute to the deterioration of the already serious social and political divisions in Taiwan.
Opposition politicians have begun their efforts to ease potential tensions ignited by recent controversial statements and actions. Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and former president Chen Shui-bian both said the shoe-throwing protest against Ma could not be condoned, even though the right to protest is a civil right, and Lee Teng-hui laughed off the Control Yuan report without seeking to retaliate.
It is time for the Ma administration, which has been sitting on the sidelines during recent instances of hateful speech, and has itself even been involved in controversial comments and activities, to take action.
Silence and tolerance of incidents such as the ridiculous Control Yuan report is no prescription for healing the wounds caused by social division.
On the contrary, to do nothing would sow the seeds of hatred.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS