Twenty-four years ago on April 7, Freedom Era Weekly (自由時代週刊) editor-in-chief Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) sacrificed his life to defend freedom of expression. Protesting the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration’s repression and the sedition charges it filed against him for publishing a draft “Taiwan Republic Constitution” in the magazine’s December 1988 issue, Deng set himself ablaze in his office in Taipei as heavily armed police attempted to break in and arrest him following 71 days of self-imposed isolation.
Deng’s heroically tragic death planted a seed of democracy in the hearts of Taiwanese that subsequently paved the way for the social movement two years later that called for the removal of Article 100 of the Criminal Code, which allowed charges of sedition to be filed against people suspected of plotting to overthrow the KMT regime.
Regrettably, other than commemorative speeches delivered by Deng’s widow, Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭), and some pan-green politicians reaffirming their support for Deng’s struggle at each anniversary of his death, Deng’s name is rarely mentioned, let alone remembered among many young Taiwanese today.
It is therefore comforting to see that a student organization at National Cheng Kung University named the 02 Group (零貳社) — a phonetic translation of “protest” in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) — will, on its own initiative, hold a candlelight vigil on Sunday evening in memory of the sacrifice made by Deng and to pledge their pursuit of the democratic causes and values that Deng laid down his life for.
The initiative undertaken by the young 02 Group members to pay homage to the late democratic activist deserves to be applauded and certainly ought to put Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Management Office to shame for being insensitive to history by holding an inappropriate design competition recently aimed at celebrating the life and marriage of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his wife.
It is also encouraging to see the Yilan County Government following in the footsteps of the Greater Tainan Government, which last year took the lead in designating April 7 as the city’s “Freedom of Expression Day,” announcing on Tuesday that it will also designate April 7 as its “Freedom of Expression Day.” However, the Yilan County Government added that it will hold human rights-related lectures for the county’s residents, in a bid to deepen their concepts and understanding of democracy.
Without Deng’s sacrifice, the nation would be unable to enjoy the freedom of expression and democracy it has today. Continuous efforts are needed to ensure that the values of democracy, human rights and freedom of speech are passed on generation after generation. To avoid any regression of the nation’s hard-earned democracy, the public needs to be constantly reminded of the blood, sweat and tears shed by Deng and other democratic pioneers.
It may be fair to say that the local governments’ designation of April 7 as “Freedom of Expression Day” is not solely to honor Deng, but rather a pledge to support the fight to uphold democratic values.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has taken pride in his administration’s efforts to protect human rights by touting how it was under his watch that the nation signed the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 2009.
Should the Ma government follow Greater Tainan and Yilan County by designating April 7 as the nation’s “Freedom of Expression Day,” in Deng’s honor, Ma’s commitment to human rights and democracy would come across to Taiwanese as more convincing.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry