Master baker Wu Pao-chun (吳寶春) is again in the glare of the media spotlight after local colleges and universities refused him admission to their executive management programs because he does not have a college degree or a “class A technician” certificate. The National University of Singapore has offered Wu admission to its program, citing Wu’s bakery expertise.
This highlights the excessive rigidity in Taiwan’s education system, which discourages innovation and undervalues the importance of fostering talent. The education system is obviously out of date and ill-equipped to adapt to the social and industrial changes of a knowledge-based economy. A major overhaul of the nation’s education system is needed.
Receiving recognition from international bakery circles, Wu won the title of Bakery Master in the bread category at the Bakery World Cup in Paris in 2010. His winning lychee bread, inspired by lychee macarons, helped generate NT$200 million (US$6.7 million) in revenue a year for Wu’s bakery. This figure is stunning, far exceeding the NT$100 million threshold set by the Ministry of Economic Affairs for small and medium-sized enterprises.
As his bakery business rapidly grew, Wu said he felt the need to strengthen his management skills, saying his breadmaking skills did not make him a good corporate manager.
“It takes more [skills and knowledge] to manage a company,” Wu told reporters last week.
He plans to open a second outlet in Taipei, after his first bakery, in Greater Kaohsiung, was overwhelmed by consumer demand.
Wu’s case reflects Taiwan’s talent drain, which is a serious headache for local corporate executives. The inflexibility of the nation’s education system has prevented Wu from upgrading his skills and his business.
The problem is that the Ministry of Education still keeps a tight grip on recruitment at colleges and universities. There was no leeway for colleges or universities to allow Wu to enroll in their Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) programs, even though they knew it would be the right thing to do. The schools know that granting admission to students like Wu would bring them higher-caliber students and prestigious alumni, but regulations disallow it.
The Singaporean government is much smarter than Taiwan’s, because it knows that talent is the key factor supporting the city-state’s economy and enhancing its competitiveness. The Singaporean government allows colleges and universities to recruit talent by interviewing applicants, rather than regarding a degree as the be-all and end-all.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Friday requested the Ministry of Education amend regulations to loosen the rules for enrolling students in EMBA programs, making such advanced management courses available to more businesspeople.
However, Ma’s move was not well-received by the public. There was much debate as to whether loosening the rules was unfair to people who study hard to gain admission to such programs. It was an illustration of how much of the public still believes studying at school and getting a good degree is the only proper avenue to success.
Unemployment among college and university graduates worsened to 5.29 percent last month from 5.13 percent in January, significantly higher than the average of 4.24 percent, the latest jobless figures from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics showed. The unemployment rate for people with advanced degrees has stood at more than 5 percent since 2009.
Myths about higher education still prevail despite the high unemployment rate among college and university graduates. A degree is no guarantee — or indicator — of sucess. To boost Taiwan’s competitiveness, our ailing education system and the public’s mindset need overhauling.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past