The first ever non-European pope takes over at the Vatican, while Italy’s economic ills and ungovernability foretell, it is argued, the wider decline of the West. First-world Catholics enmeshed in scandal in Europe and the US have turned to a devout Argentine to clean up their mess.
Meanwhile, there are weekly signs of the West’s fall. It is not a Western high-tech company challenging Apple for global dominance of the smartphone market, but South Korea’s Samsung with its new Galaxy, launched with great fanfare last week. This week, the British government will reportedly announce in its budget that Qatar is coming to the rescue of Britain with a ￡10 billion (US$15 billion) fund for infrastructure. And everyone knows about the rise of China. The world is turning on its axis. It is now a commonplace that the West is in irredeemable decline.
Economically, the trends are well established. If they continue, by 2015 Europe’s share of world GDP will have fallen to 17 percent (and to 10 percent by 2040) from the 26 percent it commanded in 1980. The US’ dominance in defense is also being steadily eroded; its budget is stagnating while China’s is growing by double digits every year. Raw materials and oil flow to Asia rather than Europe.
Europe’s population ages and its work ethic, it is claimed, is undermined by its addiction to welfare. As Western economies underperform, the most exclusive parts of London, Paris, Rome and Berlin are being bought up by the newly rich from Russia, Latin America and Asia. The richest man in the world is Carlos Slim from Mexico, while the Group of Seven leading industrialized countries is no longer the locus of world economic power. That has moved to the G20.
Even Western democracy, one reliable export to the rest of the world, no longer seems so admirable. The US government is deadlocked over its budget so that after the arbitrary spending sequester on March 1, parts of government will start to close down at the end of the month. Perhaps the benign dictatorship of the Chinese Communist party offers a better model for governance.
Yet look more closely and a more subtle, more encouraging story is at work — less the decline of the West than the steady spread of its values and practices. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is pope because he embodies — at least in Catholic eyes — the best of the Western Catholic tradition. He may defend core values on marriage and sexuality, however irrelevant and unjustified they now seem in secular Europe and the US, but is avowedly liberal on social issues and poverty. Catholic social policy, with its commitment to justice, fulfilling work and the necessity to enfranchize every human, is one of the better components of the religion’s tradition.
This social policy was an outgrowth of the church coming to terms with the Enlightenment. If it is to survive, it will have to come to terms with the Enlightenment’s view that sex is not immoral and sexual preferences should not be stigmatized. Pope Francis might also come to regret his alleged compromises with the Argentine junta. Nonetheless, he is the best the Roman Catholic church can offer in holding an impossible line — and might prove to be one of the last who tries to do so. Soon, there will be no part of the world, not even the Catholic church, not touched by Enlightenment virtues.
The same painful process has begun in the Arab world. The Arab Spring represented a series of societies insisting on a voice, the rule of law, representative government, freedom from arbitrary imprisonment and freedom of expression. Yes, the first beneficiaries have been religious fundamentalists and Islamist zealots, but that is only to be expected in the first phase of the process. Fundamentalism is a response to being under siege; it is because Western Enlightenment values are so attractive that Arab societies, concerned to preserve their identity, reaffirm their “Arabness” via religion. The attraction of the Muslim Brotherhood is much more complicated than mere religious fundamentalism — they also have a partial Enlightenment commitment to justice.
Nor is China immune. Last week saw the Sina Weibo microblogging site full of anonymous mockery of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) monarchial, unopposed anointment to lead. Censorship is breaking down. The regime dares imprison fewer and fewer overt political prisoners. Meanwhile, the Communist party’s upper echelons anxiously debate how legitimacy is to be won in a one-party state, but even more anxiously question how China’s growth rate is to be maintained now it can no longer just copy Western technology, but must develop some of its own. Science, freedom of inquiry, peer review, openness to new ideas and honest statistics turn out not to be bourgeois Western ideas, but fundamental to innovation. They cannot be promoted in a one-party state.
Nor is it clear that the US is to be written off quite so quickly. The anti-Enlightenment US right has become locked in an anti-scientific, anti-sexual revolution and anti-justice ideology — and has lost the popular vote in five out of the last six presidential elections. US President Barack Obama’s electoral victory last year could be read as the great republic reasserting its commitment to Enlightenment values. Part of the rapidly escalating US economic recovery is about cheap shale gas, but part is about the rediscovery of an Enlightenment commitment to research and development, now reaching record levels, and the innovation that goes with it. As the Tea Party right’s progress stalls, there is an emerging confidence that the US has not lost its way after all.
In Britain, a similar drama is playing itself out. British Prime Minister David Cameron’s modernization project was an attempt to make his party come to terms with Enlightenment truths — on climate change, the environment, same-sex marriage, open innovation and even social justice — but he has been beaten back into the same dark laager inhabited by US conservatives. A small state and a balanced budget are everything in this theology. Along with individualism, they are considered to be all that is needed for capitalist success and social harmony.
These are propositions that never did work. Successful capitalism is co-created by private and public initiative, a marriage between the market and the Enlightenment — its values and its publicly created institutions. Hence Britain and the US in their different historical contexts; thus South Korea today. It is this alchemy that drove the rise of the West and is now driving the dynamism in the rest of the world. We in the West should remember what drove our success. Rather than mourn our relative decline, let’s celebrate others getting as good, if not better, at what we used to practice and have allowed to atrophy. Then we must find ways to rediscover the alchemy ourselves.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement