People’s privacy should be rightfully respected. However, when it comes to public figures, particularly influential ones in the upper echelons of government, they should expect to sacrifice their privacy to a certain extent and expose parts of their lives to public scrutiny, as their actions — both open and clandestine — affect the course and security of their nation.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is no exception. Power comes with responsibility, and as the head of the state, Ma enjoys various executive privileges bestowed upon him by the Constitution of the Republic of China. At the same time, he is duty-bound to be held accountable for his actions — and by extension those of members of his family. He cannot simply brush off or dodge public scrutiny on the pretext of personal privacy.
Therefore, it was surprising to many when the Presidential Office on Monday confirmed media reports that the eldest of Ma’s two daughters, Lesley Ma (馬唯中), had married last year in New York and that she and her husband, Allen Tsai (蔡沛然), currently reside in Hong Kong.
“Why all the secrecy?” many wondered after the first family confirmed the marriage only when it came to light earlier this week.
While the confirmation has provoked a frenzy among a number of local media outlets which focused their coverage on Tsai’s looks, his past stint as a model and gossip about how the couple first met — coverage which probably plays into the pan-blue camp’s wish to frame such reports as pure celebrity gossip — there are serious matters that should be discussed.
First of all, the issue of the president’s credibility is at stake. Ma Ying-jeou had previously pledged that he would announce the news of any potential marriage of his daughters. If the president had kept his word and done as promised, no one would have had to second-guess the first family and question whether it has anything to hide.
While some pan-blue lawmakers have been quick to come to the defense of the first family, calling on the public to respect its privacy, their argument only serves to further irk members of the public about how blatantly they apply double standards when it comes to politicians in different camps.
In case they need a reminder, during the presidency of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), they chastised Chen’s son, Chen Chih-chung (陳致中), and his daughter-in-law, Huang Jui-ching (黃睿靚), telling them to return to Taiwan so their first child could be born in Taiwan, rather than in the US.
At the time, none of the lawmakers defended the couple’s right to personal privacy or argued that their personal decisions should be respected.
Then, the media also hounded Chen Shui-bian’s daughter, Chen Hsin-yu (陳幸妤), often claiming she put on a poker face with the media when she was simply not very expressive. On the other hand, Lesley Ma has been described by the media as “keeping a low profile” when she was also simply just expressionless.
It is a shame that such blatant double standards exist in Taiwan, a country that prides itself on its democratic achievements.
As a number of opposition lawmakers have pointed out recently, there is also concern about the couple’s safety — and by extension, Taiwan’s national security — because the president’s daughter and son-in-law now reside in Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, which still harbors hostility toward Taiwan and makes no secret of its desire to annex it.
All these are serious issues. The nation’s taxpayers deserve transparent information from the Presidential Office. These issues cannot be written off as personal privacy and be shut off from public scrutiny.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US