Chen’s suffering unjust
Taiwan is a newly developed country, but former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is currently serving a 30-year sentence on corruption charges.
After examining Chen in May and June last year, I pointed out that he was suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), but the Ministry of Justice and Executive Yuan denied this in an official statement.
In September last year, through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at a public hospital, unusual bright spots were found in his subcortical regions. He was transferred to Taipei Veterans General Hospital, where an interview by 10 renowned psychiatrists and the MRI images confirmed that Chen was suffering from MDD.
Chen was found to have typical MDD symptoms such as dysphoric moods, lack of interest in daily activities, feelings of hopelessness, waking early in the morning and even suicidal thoughts.
Delayed treatment might cause his brain functions to deteriorate rapidly.
Many possible factors could have caused his condition, including the complexity of the litigation against him, for example the numerous flip-flops between guilty and innocence verdicts in the Presidential Discretionary Fund case. The reversal of the not guilty verdict in July especially shocked Chen.
Because of the incompleteness of the laws and the randomness of different verdicts by different courts after three years of protesting his innocence, Chen, one of the best attorneys in the country, is at a loss on how to proceed and has had a mental breakdown.
For the last two years, he has been incarcerated in a tiny cell, without a bed, chair or table. He was forced to sit on the floor to write. He was isolated for 23-and-a-half hours a day with a light left on for 24 hours. This is like torture.
At present, he is easily distracted, finding it difficult to think clearly. He is psychomotor retarded, a condition associated with delusions of persecution. He suffers mood swings.
Any rumor of returning to Taipei Prison makes him extremely suspicious, angry and nervous. Chen is no longer capable of pursuing politics, forming a new party, or escaping the country.
He is over 60 years old. He did not commit treason and he is not anti-social. Continuing his incarceration has no significance. He is a former democratically elected president. I strongly suggest releasing him and letting him go home to recover from his illnesses.
Chiao-Chicy Chen, MD, PhD
Taipei
DPP not so progressive
On Sunday, about 150,000 people joined the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rally to protest the government’s policies on a range of issues.
Out of power in the legislature, the DPP has still been working hard to hold the Ma government to account and scrutinize its performance.
Unlike the claim by some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials, peaceful rallies and protests are part of a healthy functional democracy.
On the other hand, the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) that the government often wields to restrict public protest is a birdcage, put in place by the KMT after the Martial Law era ended to prevent Taiwanese using democracy and determining their sovereignty.
Yet, the DPP, by its own hand, also cages itself –– by letting the KMT frame the terms of debate, while timidly aligning itself with an imagined “centrist” position in the hope that it will lead to electoral success.
Three specific examples come to mind: the death penalty, economic policy and the issue of sovereignty over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
In 2006, the DPP instituted a moratorium against the use of the death penalty and now complains when Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) sneeringly ignores the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. However, it won’t come out and state that abolishing the death penalty is a core policy goal.
The DPP’s own economic policy platform does not differ that much from the KMT’s. It is just a tweaking of cargo cult crony neoliberalism underpinning the chaebol-type policies of the KMT.
The KMT is stuck in an ideological fantasy that imagines that Taiwan is still an “Asian Tiger” economy of the 1970s that will be saved by merging with the People’s Republic of China economically. But the DPP will not directly challenge this. They seek only to modify it.
In terms of the Diaoyutai Islands, the DPP can not bring itself to acknowledge the elephant in the room. It has caged itself out of fear of the media and the fishermen’s associations, and once again only seeks to modify KMT policies.
This plays into the hands of the CCP and KMT as they seek to weaken Taipei-Tokyo and Taipei-Washington ties, facilitating the Chinese strategic policy of raising tensions.
How, then, can the DPP claim these policies are in any way “progressive”?
Ben Goren
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US