The Cabinet’s plan to follow up the reform of the Bureau of Labor Insurance and the Bureau of National Health Insurance by designating more than 1,000 employees as civil servants and therefore eligable for pension entitlements has met with disapproval from the Examination Yuan. Examination Yuan President John Kuan (關中) has said that he would not allow this to happen.
It is rare for the Examination Yuan, which has always been a weak institution, to stand up to the Cabinet and its stance exposes the truth behind the government’s organizational reform. The restructuring was intended to streamline agencies and staff, but although some agencies have disappeared, the number of civil servants has actually increased, inflating the government’s expenditure on salaries and pensions. The Cabinet should take the Examination Yuan’s warning seriously, because if it tries to use its superior power to ignore Kuan it will be humiliated.
Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) has disagreed with Kuan. Chen said that the employees in question passed the Examination Yuan exams in the past and have had certificates issued by both the Examination Yuan president and the premier, meaning that they qualify for the same treatment as civil servants. He is wrong: These employees passed a financial test administered by the Examination Yuan, which was designed for technical staff or used for promotions. It was not a test to obtain civil servant qualifications. Therefore the test is not enough to upgrade them to regular civil servant status.
Article 85 of the Constitution states that “in the selection of public functionaries, a system of open competitive examination shall be put into operation: No person shall be appointed to a public office unless he is qualified through examination.”
Article 2 of the law regulating civil servant exams further states that civil servants shall be selected through a system of open, competitive examination and that no person shall enjoy special privileges based on their status. That law also states that in case of discrepancy with other laws, this law should take precedence. The rules are clear. There are no gray areas.
More than 700 employees at the Ministry of Transportation and Communications also find themselves in a similar situation to the employees of the two bureaus. Trying to use organizational restructuring as a reason to incorporate all these employees into the civil servant system will not only raise salary payments, but also the government’s retirement payments, which will increase by more than NT$10 billion (US$345 million).
With the government’s current fiscal difficulties, payments for health insurance, labor insurance and pensions for public sector workers are already causing difficulties. Add this to the current debate over the increasing burden on the Treasury and it is easy to see why the Cabinet’s proposal is unacceptable to everyone. At a time when the Democratic Progressive Party is preparing to hold a big anti-government demonstration, the Cabinet should not ignore public opinion.
The “government reform” slogan has been exposed as a lie. The number of civil servants is increasing, human resource expenditures are exploding and the government has failed to streamline operations. Instead, it has become more bloated.
To incorporate employees lacking the required qualifications into the ranks of the civil servant sector is a violation of equality requirements, recruitment and qualification system regulations, the Constitution and legislation governing the hiring of civil servants.
It is unacceptable to the Examination Yuan, the legislature will not agree to it, the Council of Grand Justices will determine it is unconstitutional and the general public will oppose it.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US