Two international academics recently reminded our government that a group of international human rights experts is expected to review Taiwan’s implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) next month, and expressly asked that no executions be carried out until such time. They intimated that, in the absence of any executions, the review was to be a formality only, and that if Taiwan held off on executions until that time, it would be much easier for them to sign off on the review.
Whether he is truly stupid, or just puts on a convincing show of it, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) chose last month, just two months before the review was due, to instruct the minister of justice to sign off on six executions. It was as if he wanted to get them over and done with, in the hope that they would be forgotten by the time the review rolls around. Evidently, the government could not wait until March.
Ma had not been in office for four months in early 2008 before people started questioning his competence, and before the first six months of his second term were up, the British magazine The Economist was calling him a “bumbler.” The main problem was his lack of action or efficiency, causing the majority of the electorate to become disillusioned. Whenever he comes up against criticism, he pretends to be contrite and self-effacing, promising to improve. And how appropriate the words “con” and “trite,” “self” and “face” are. Nothing changes, and then, another round of criticism.
Now in his second term, Ma cannot stand for re-election, so he no longer faces any electoral pressure. What he should be doing is throwing himself into reform. If he were to work to strengthen the nation’s democracy and reinforce social justice, his approval ratings would climb, and history would likely judge him more favorably. Taiwan’s democracy still needs much work. Our social justice mechanisms are not yet effective, and this is leading to some serious sociopolitical problems. Ma promised “complete governance.” Well, he has a majority, and he should be using this advantage to completely restructure the central government and implement congressional, judicial and media reforms.
The central government system remains flawed, even after seven amendments to the Republic of China Constitution. The president still has excessive powers, with no constraints in place. The premier in no way resembles the role of prime minister as stipulated in the Constitution, and instead appears more like the top aide to the president. There are also problems in the relationship between the president, the Cabinet and the legislature. Ma should be instigating comprehensive reform via constitutional amendments.
The public is disillusioned with the president and the legislature. The legislature is not fit for its purpose and legislators are all in it for themselves, disdainful of their duty to legislate and, in some cases, guilty of serious corruption. The president should have initiated legislative reform some time ago, but has yet to lift a finger. The media is a knot of problems, and is being concentrated in the hands of huge conglomerates. A pernicious, pro-China group is attempting to get a monopoly on the press in this country, and the government is just standing by and letting it happen, exhibiting absolutely no appetite for reform. Ma should understand that the press is essential for democracy, and he should be doing everything he can to create a media environment conducive to democracy and social justice.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US