When it comes to developing the tourism sector, Taiwan often finds itself in a clearly contradictory situation. On the one hand, Taiwanese envy the natural and tranquil beauty of the countryside in developed countries, while on the other hand, the nation’s own countryside is being destroyed as fast as possible, almost as if any area without large buildings, highways or large hotels is a sign of backwardness. However, there is nothing backward about a lack of large buildings and highways; what is backward is the lack of confidence this mode of thinking represents.
Many years ago I went on holiday to a small island in Southeast Asia. The sunset on the island’s coast was extremely beautiful. I discovered several especially beautiful strips of beach without a single person on them and several other strips of beach that were dirty, noisy and full of locals. I asked my friend who was showing me around why the locals did not go to the other more beautiful and cleaner stretches of beach, instead of all crowding into the one area. My friend gave a wry smile and said this was because after many years of development, all the beautiful strips of beach had been sold to international hotel corporations and that what the locals were left with were these few pieces of leftover land that even the government was not interested in developing, and that they could not do anything about the mess. This sort of thing had not happened in Taiwan at that time, so I was very shocked. My friend also said that they had not just sold off their beaches, but also their dignity.
Taiwan has now reached the same stage. The nation is confronted by a massive wave of ignorance, short-sightedness and greed that threatens to completely destroy its coastline, culture and ecology. What is worse is that this destruction and theft of land is supposedly being carried out in the name of developing the local tourism industry.
A few days ago, the head of a certain government department talked with all the confidence in the world about how clean the Miramar Resort Village in Taitung County is, how much work has already been performed on it and how it would be a pity to demolish it. However, all the locals in the area know that the place where the resort is being built, Shanyuan Bay (杉原灣), has always been beautiful and pristine. This is precisely why they are so upset and precisely why corporations are coveting this piece of land.
After the Eastern Development Act (東部發展條例) was approved on June 29, all of the forests and beaches of the entire east coast are in danger of being bought up by corporations. The entire east coast is full of slogans on billboards proclaiming “sustainable development.” However, what is really happening is that the environment is being destroyed in the name of this supposed development.
It is high time that Taiwanese started thinking about what “development” actually means and what type of development they want. I do not believe that paring down forests, conducting beach dredging and filling projects, ignoring the opinions of local residents and building ugly concrete hotels in the name of a superficial boom in tourism are the only ways to build a future for Taitung. Taitung’s breathtaking landscape has given birth to a culture and magnanimity among its locals that is much larger than that.
Where does Taitung’s hope lie? I believe it lies in the immense dignity the local people are showing in the fight against the very people who are trying to take their land away from them.
Ko Yu-fen is an associate professor of journalism at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS