Over the past year there have been more than 90 self-immolations by Tibetans living under Chinese rule in their own country. Over the past two months these self-immolations — carried out in protest against suppression by the Chinese communists — have been becoming increasingly frequent, sometimes with as many as one a day. On Nov. 25, a 17-year-old Buddhist nun, named Sangye Dolma, set herself ablaze, leaving behind a photograph of herself with the words: “Tibet independent nation” written across her hand. Not long before this, on Nov. 7 — the eve of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 18th National Congress — a young monk, 16-year-old Samdrup, along with two others, also self-immolated outside a public security bureau station in Aba County, Sichuan Province.
He left behind a will that read: “I dedicate this most merciful blessing to my family, especially my parents. I have set myself on fire for Tibet. I pray that the Dalai Lama will live a long life, shining the light of happiness throughout these snow-covered lands.”
Tibetans are a peaceful people, and even in death, even when they are self-immolating, they do not display the slightest hint of anger, enmity or hatred. What they want is quite simple: freedom for Tibet, the return of the Dalai Lama and the release of the Panchen Lama.
Despite the simplicity of their demands, the iron rule of the CCP has forced them to resort to the drastic measure of self-immolating, of burning themselves alive, as a means to express their wishes. This is why the Chinese, who like to see themselves as an emerging superpower, find it so difficult to tolerate, and also why they are hell-bent on spreading negative propaganda about the Dalai Lama, Tibetans and Tibetan Buddhism to the rest of the world.
In Taiwan there is a lot of anger and ongoing protest against the acquisition of parts of the Next Media Group’s operations in Taiwan. The China Times Group — owned by the Want Want China Times Group — is using this diversion to quietly and insidiously increase its offensive over Tibet.
When the government refused a visa for the Dalai Lama to visit Taiwan, the Chinese-language Want Daily published an editorial praising the government’s decision as “[sending] the right political message.”
Within the space of a week, the Chinese-language China Times published a couple of submissions on the Dalai Lama, riddled with historical inaccuracies and ridiculously distorted misinterpretations of his religion, in an attempt to both influence — or indoctrinate — well-intentioned Taiwanese who sympathize with Tibetans, and to create conditions within society to promulgate Chinese hegemony.
The Dalai Lama first visited Taiwan in 1997, and back then public opinion was overwhelmingly respectful and well-disposed toward him. Times change, however, and now, within certain elements of the media, there has started to appear some rather distorted attitudes toward the Dalai Lama and Tibetans in general. Given this marked disparity, there are clearly machinations going on in the background.
Because of this, Taiwanese have to understand that, should the proposed Next Media acquisition be allowed to go ahead, the independence of the media will be threatened, and Taiwan will face a situation similar to that in Hong Kong, where it is difficult to express ideas that do not toe the official line.
Taiwan’s freedom is now in danger of being extinguished, like a flame flickering in a strengthening wind. Every Taiwanese should stand up and shield it.
Chou Mei-li is chairwoman of Taiwan Friends of Tibet.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US