“If you are not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing,” Malcolm X once said.
It is amazing how quickly focus can be shifted by just one media report, as in the case of the frenzy surrounding National Tsing Hua University student Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) over the past few days.
Chen, a participant in the recent student protests against the takeover of Next Media Group’s four Taiwanese outlets involving the pro-China, Taiwan-based Want Want China Times Group, was invited by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers to attend the legislative Education and Culture Committee meeting on Monday for a special session.
Rather than focusing on the real issue — concern about freedom of speech on campus after an e-mail from the Ministry of Education asked universities to “show concern” for and investigate students who took part in the protests — one media outlet on Tuesday dedicated its front page and another full page to slamming Chen for accusing Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) of incompetence, hypocrisy and lying about his support for the student movement. A number of pan-blue politicians jumped on the bandwagon and said Chen had no manners.
The blatant double standards of the pan-blue camp are dumbfounding. After all, in September 2006, amid a campaign by red-clad protesters to oust then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP, sixth-grader Chen Tso-fei (陳昨非) was hailed by certain media outlets and pan-blue politicians for criticizing Chen Shui-bian in a poem he recited at the protest. No one from the pan-blue camp chided Chen Tso-fei for not showing respect to the president. However, let a minister in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government be criticized by a student and see how fast the pan-blue attack dogs come out.
Several pan-blue lawmakers also criticized Chen Wei-ting for intervening in legislative operations. They apparently forgot that Article 67 of the Constitution clearly states: “the legislature may set up various committees and such committees may invite government officials and concerned private persons to be present at their meetings to answer questions.”
Those who have been quick to condemn Chen Wei-ting for his accusations against Chiang have forgotten the big picture. Those who have not been following the protests against the Next Media buyout closely and have only seen a few seconds of a video clip in a news broadcast might form the opinion that Chen Wei-ting was acting rudely and being hard on Chiang. However, if they took a few more minutes to examine the whole issue from the beginning, putting themselves in protesters’ shoes and looking at what they encountered — Chiang’s failure to answer the students’ call to show up at the protest, the heavy deployment of riot police at the protests and the ministry’s e-mail, to name but a few — then they might be more understanding of the exasperation Chen Wei-ting felt.
It is hard to remain silent in the face of arrogance, but manners are not really the point here — it is the public’s concern over the creation of media monopolies.
Perhaps some media outlets are trying to demonize Chen Wei-ting and his fellow protesters in a bid to draw attention away from the real issues at hand. If that is the case, their efforts have backfired, at least among the nation’s young people, who are continuing to come forward to support efforts to block media monopolies.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95