Once again, the issue of surrogate mothers has become a hot topic of debate. As infertile couples tell their sad stories, it seems difficult to reject their call for the deregulation of surrogate pregnancies. However, the question of how to go about meeting their needs without commercializing the female body is a difficult dilemma and involves some hard choices.
The issue of surrogate motherhood is not simply about a woman providing the use of her uterus. A surrogate mother also has to face many risks during pregnancy and delivery.
They include amniotic fluid embolism, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, entering a vegetative state, death, stillbirth, premature birth and giving birth to an unhealthy child.
There are also the problems of infections or death following fetal reduction surgery and multiple births. In addition to providing her womb, a surrogate mother devotes 10 months of her life, both physically and psychologically, and her whole family — husband, children, in-laws — are involved and deeply affected.
Apart from close relatives and friends and a few so-called charitable people, most of those who, knowing all the risks and difficulties, still decide to volunteer for the task mostly come from economically disadvantaged groups.
Since it takes at least NT$1 million (US$34,280) to employ a surrogate mother, infertile couples may rather hire a surrogate mother who minimizes risks, who is obedient and who does what she is told.
Therefore, the economically disadvantaged always seem to be the first choice. This means that it is very likely that Taiwan would get a surrogacy system designed for the rich that would give them special privileges and allow them to buy a service that might lead to the injury or death of someone else.
In a way, they might even buy the autonomy of the provider, thus turning a woman into a mere tool for producing children. This economic temptation would erode the human dignity of the economically disadvantaged.
As the income gap between the rich and less well-off continues to widen in Taiwan, a surrogacy system could lead to the exploitation of women. Should the current ban be lifted, putting healthy surrogate mothers at risk just to satisfy the desires of childless couples?
This is an issue that should be collectively decided by the public.
According to Taiwanese law, live organ donation is legal only among blood relatives within the fifth degree of relationship, and donations from so-called “charitable people” is illegal.
The law is based not only on respect for human life and dignity, but also to prevent exploitation that could result from selling organs for monetary gain in the name of charity.
That is how strict the nation’s regulations are when it comes to a situation when there is no other way to save a life.
Should looser regulations be adopted to satisfy the desires of childless couples who want a child by letting such “charitable” people function as surrogate mothers?
This is a serious question that society should think long and hard about.
Chang Hui-ju is deputy secretary-general of Taiwan Women’s Link.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS