The Ministry of Foreign Affairs came under heavy fire from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers on Thursday after it emerged that it had turned down a visa request for the Dalai Lama so he could deliver an address to an international conference next week.
There was much gnashing of teeth by DPP lawmakers, who wanted to know why the request was rejected and whether Taiwanese would have to wait until the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was out of power before the Dalai Lama could visit Taiwan a fourth time.
The atmosphere at the legislature was not helped by the waffling of ministry officials, who could only mutter that this “was not a good time” and that a visit would have to wait for a “more opportune moment.”
That appears to be diplomatic speak for “when hell freezes over or there is another disaster like Typhoon Morakot.”
The government was not helped by the ministry, in the form of spokesman Steve Hsia (夏季昌), who denied that China had anything to do with the decision. Of course it did, even if as nothing more than a bogeyman. Even the former DPP administration took Beijing into account when granting the Dalai Lama a visa.
That the visa request came from an international organization did not count for much, despite the government’s oft-proclaimed desire to expand Taiwan’s role on the world stage, because the Dalai Lama was not being invited so much as a religious leader, but as a political icon. It is almost impossible to separate the Dalai Lama’s religious role from politics, even though he has given up his position as head of the Tibetan government-in-exile, but it helps if he is conducting religious lectures and ceremonies.
The Dalai Lama’s three visits to Taiwan have all centered on religion. His first trip, in 1997, came at the invitation of the Chinese Buddhism Association for a series of lectures, even though he met with then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and vice president Lien Chan (連戰). However, the political side of those meetings was downplayed, with Lien seeing the Dalai Lama at a hotel and Lee meeting him at the foreign ministry’s Guest House rather than at the Presidential Office. A planned speech to the Legislative Yuan was also canceled.
The Lee government was unwilling to consider a second trip and a visit planned for 1998 was called off.
The focus of the Dalai Lama’s second visit in 2001, when the DPP was in power, was religious lectures, although he was met at the airport by government officials and lawmakers. He also met then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
His 2009 visit, made at the invitation of seven DPP mayors and county commissioners, was to provide succor to victims and survivors of Morakot.
Requests for visas for trips at the invitation of non-religious groups, such as one by the Association of Taiwan Journalists in 2009, have been rejected.
It is truly regrettable that the International Federation of Business and Professional Women will not be able to hear the Dalai Lama speak. However, one has to wonder if the group has been made a pawn in the never-ending blue-green political battle, given that the conference is being organized by the federation’s local chapter, which is headed by Lu. She could not have really expected the government to grant the Dalai Lama a visa; it was not even a long shot.
If this episode is to be judged as yet another piece of political theater, the foreign ministry’s performance has been abysmal. The federation made its visa request, in the form of letters from its international president on Aug. 28 and Sept. 10, yet the ministry did not issue a reply until Nov. 16, just two weeks before the opening of the conference.
The Dalai Lama should be able to visit Taiwan no matter who invites him. The sad truth is no matter which party is in power, the odds are better of him being given a visa if the trip is for religious reasons.
This administration has done the nation a great disservice with its disingenuousness and hiding behind an excuse of “waiting for a more opportune time.”
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past