The Ministry of Foreign Affairs came under heavy fire from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers on Thursday after it emerged that it had turned down a visa request for the Dalai Lama so he could deliver an address to an international conference next week.
There was much gnashing of teeth by DPP lawmakers, who wanted to know why the request was rejected and whether Taiwanese would have to wait until the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was out of power before the Dalai Lama could visit Taiwan a fourth time.
The atmosphere at the legislature was not helped by the waffling of ministry officials, who could only mutter that this “was not a good time” and that a visit would have to wait for a “more opportune moment.”
That appears to be diplomatic speak for “when hell freezes over or there is another disaster like Typhoon Morakot.”
The government was not helped by the ministry, in the form of spokesman Steve Hsia (夏季昌), who denied that China had anything to do with the decision. Of course it did, even if as nothing more than a bogeyman. Even the former DPP administration took Beijing into account when granting the Dalai Lama a visa.
That the visa request came from an international organization did not count for much, despite the government’s oft-proclaimed desire to expand Taiwan’s role on the world stage, because the Dalai Lama was not being invited so much as a religious leader, but as a political icon. It is almost impossible to separate the Dalai Lama’s religious role from politics, even though he has given up his position as head of the Tibetan government-in-exile, but it helps if he is conducting religious lectures and ceremonies.
The Dalai Lama’s three visits to Taiwan have all centered on religion. His first trip, in 1997, came at the invitation of the Chinese Buddhism Association for a series of lectures, even though he met with then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and vice president Lien Chan (連戰). However, the political side of those meetings was downplayed, with Lien seeing the Dalai Lama at a hotel and Lee meeting him at the foreign ministry’s Guest House rather than at the Presidential Office. A planned speech to the Legislative Yuan was also canceled.
The Lee government was unwilling to consider a second trip and a visit planned for 1998 was called off.
The focus of the Dalai Lama’s second visit in 2001, when the DPP was in power, was religious lectures, although he was met at the airport by government officials and lawmakers. He also met then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮).
His 2009 visit, made at the invitation of seven DPP mayors and county commissioners, was to provide succor to victims and survivors of Morakot.
Requests for visas for trips at the invitation of non-religious groups, such as one by the Association of Taiwan Journalists in 2009, have been rejected.
It is truly regrettable that the International Federation of Business and Professional Women will not be able to hear the Dalai Lama speak. However, one has to wonder if the group has been made a pawn in the never-ending blue-green political battle, given that the conference is being organized by the federation’s local chapter, which is headed by Lu. She could not have really expected the government to grant the Dalai Lama a visa; it was not even a long shot.
If this episode is to be judged as yet another piece of political theater, the foreign ministry’s performance has been abysmal. The federation made its visa request, in the form of letters from its international president on Aug. 28 and Sept. 10, yet the ministry did not issue a reply until Nov. 16, just two weeks before the opening of the conference.
The Dalai Lama should be able to visit Taiwan no matter who invites him. The sad truth is no matter which party is in power, the odds are better of him being given a visa if the trip is for religious reasons.
This administration has done the nation a great disservice with its disingenuousness and hiding behind an excuse of “waiting for a more opportune time.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers