The US presidential election is over. Following a hard fought election campaign, President Barack Obama was re-elected. Inside the Republican Party, which is also known as the Grand Old Party, people are now calling for a period of reflection as they say that their party is too white, too old and too male.
Outside observers may be happy to add another epithet to that description: too fat.
Too white: More than half of those who voted for Republican candidate Mitt Romney were white. Black Americans, Hispanic Americans and Asian-Americans all voted overwhelmingly for Obama.
Too old: Younger voter groups leaned toward Obama, while older voters leaned toward Romney.
Too male: Romney won the male vote and lost the female vote.
Too fat: Romney won among the wealthy “fat cats” and lost among lower-income voters.
As the number of non-white immigrants to the US increases, so is their influence. This is causing some conservative, white, political commentators to complain that white people are gradually becoming a minority in the US.
White people still remain the largest group, but the delicate changes to population structure and to ideological awareness have already punched a hole in the traditional view that the president must be a white person, and that a president running for re-election in times of economic hardship will lose.
As a result of the conservatism of the Republican Party, some Republicans are calling for small government, tax reductions, a shrinking of the social welfare system and protection of traditional values, as well as opposing homosexual rights, abortions and immigration.
The party’s extreme right is made up of the Tea Party, which was so successful two years ago when it made a splash as a representative of angry white men. However, this year the Tea Party has lost its luster.
The liberals within the Democratic Party are leaning toward socialism, big government and tax increases for the wealthy as a way of dealing with the budget crisis. This is an ideology that is more in line with the hopes of many modern voters who ask the government to care for them and to solve any economic problems.
Young voters and housewives are more likely to identify with the Democrats’ tolerance on social and moral issues, and to oppose right-wing religious views. Hispanic Americans are even more focused on a single issue: opposition to the Republicans’ anti-immigration policies.
Obama is not afraid of calling for higher taxes on the wealthy, and while this has earned him the intense dislike of Wall Street, it has gained him the support of the US public.
The structure of the Taiwanese electorate is similar to that of the US, but it yields the opposite results. Hoklo voters, the largest group, are divided, but Hakka voters and recent immigrants are strongly in favor of the too fat, too arrogant and too corrupt Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
They have elected those who are not supportive of Taiwan: a heartless and inept government that only cares for the rich and ignores the disadvantaged.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath