Last week both Sean Lien (連勝文) and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) made thinly veiled attacks on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his handling of the economy. Lien remarked that whoever is elected as the next mayor of Taipei, given the sluggish economy, “could be, at the very most, the master of a beggar clan,” while Wu commented that Ma was guilty of selecting individuals for important government posts from too narrow a group.
Senior members of the KMT and the party spokesperson hit back at Lien and Wu, but nothing was heard from Ma. It was only when he made a personal appearance, after the furor failed to dissipate, that everyone realized that Ma had asked senior party members and the party spokesperson to speak out on his behalf.
The World Taiwanese Chambers of Commerce criticized Ma for “looking in the mirror for political appointees.” While it is widely acknowledged that Ma always chooses people with preconceived ideas from a limited circle, the mirror metaphor nailed the problem so neatly that people finally started talking about it openly. Wu’s comments were neither new nor particularly acerbic, but Lien’s beggar clan remark rang true, striking a chord with a society suffering from shrinking incomes and feeling they are virtually living like beggars already. With the poverty gap so wide, millions are finding it difficult to make ends meet and feel that the days of the “beggar clan” are not too far off.
Ma chose not to deal with the problems that the press are giving him a daily roasting for, preferring to keep his head down and ride out the storm, offering no account of himself. When the criticisms became more than mere criticisms and the public actually started to feel the direct effect of his policies, he found himself at a loss for words. It is no wonder that even the pro-blue press are saying that Ma has lost the power of speech.
However, the public are more interested in what he proposes to do, rather than in what he has to say. It has got to the point now where the public do not just disbelieve what he says; they actually feel derision every time he opens his mouth.
Ma’s bringing the economy to its knees did not start in his second term. Financial commentators are united in saying that by making the economy overly reliant on China, Ma has allowed companies to make a profit, but at the price of transferring technology, capital and talent to the other side of the Taiwan Strait, impoverishing the country. Economists on both sides of the political divide have made a similar assessment. Manufacturing representatives have come out in the last few days slating the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) as being next to useless in getting Taiwan out of its current predicament.
Why did Taiwan sleepwalk into becoming the “Republic of Beggardom”? The saddest part is that the public is not to blame.
The citizens of the forthcoming “Republic of Beggardom” will be beggars indeed, but Lien’s “masters of the beggar clan,” will still be living in glory and riches. The attacks on Ma within the KMT were not done with the public interest at heart, they were about little more than shifting power relations. Those in the party can smell a time when Ma will no longer be leader and they are riding on the back of increasing public anger as if speaking for them. Do not be fooled.
Is Lien blameless for Taiwan’s current predicament? Should Wu not shoulder some of the responsibility for where the nation finds itself?
If accounts are to be settled, it should be done properly.
Masters of the beggar clan — Taiwanese should make pariahs of the lot of them.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS