Following the government’s decision to postpone any increase in the minimum wage, the Cabinet has instructed the Council for Labor Affairs to review the current Regulations for the Deliberation of Basic Wage (基本工資審議辦法) and to look into the viability of applying a different minimum wage based on where employees live, how old they are and which industry they work in. However, the government is betraying a rather myopic approach here, with respect to whether it intends to reduce the role of the Minimum Wage Review Committee or whether it wants to introduce a tiered minimum wage system.
First, in addition to considering what constitutes a reasonable minimum wage, it is also of vital importance that any minimum wage policy uphold the principle of social partnerships throughout the entire decisionmaking process. The policy should determine the degree of any adjustment through social dialogue and in the interests of the democratic process, consensus forming and good governance. This means that the function of the Minimum Wage Review Committee goes beyond putting workers on equal footing with capitalists for negotiations.
The hope is that it will, through the ongoing negotiations, facilitate the sharing of information and exchanging of ideas to achieve balance and understanding on the respective parties’ differing views. Hopefully, this will enable labor relations to develop in the right direction.
Given this, the format generally followed at this stage of proceedings is to establish a platform for dialogue between all of the stakeholders with a view to reaching consensus.
According to International Labour Organization (ILO) statistics, the governments of nearly half the countries currently employing a minimum wage system arrived at their final decision with recommendations and opinions gained via tripartite consultation. By contrast, the Taiwanese government first overturned the minimum wage resolution and then set about trying to undermine the Minimum Wage Review Committee to reduce its influence, essentially dismantling the negotiation mechanism. Any policy forced through unilaterally by the government is sure to give rise to conflict on a weekly basis between workers and capitalists in the future.
Second, the ILO has long recommended that any minimum wage system maintain one minimum wage level for the entire workforce.
More than 60 percent of countries with a minimum wage have applied a uniform level within their borders. Only a minority have set different minimum wages according to region, industry or age. Such policies can cause problems. For example, regional differentiation of the minimum wage can lead companies to relocate to areas that have lower minimum wages and subsequently to mass internal migration of workers to other regions. The consequence of this is inter-regional tensions and a vicious circle of wage competition leading to ever-decreasing wages. Determining minimum wage by age can also lead to workers being replaced.
When times are hard, governments often view any and all labor-related mechanisms as an impediment to economic growth, and the direction in which the minimum wage issue is going at the moment is a product of skewed thinking completely at odds with developmental trends within the international community.
The government should return the power to decide the minimum wage level to the review mechanism and apply a single level across the board.
Liou You-syue is a doctoral student in the Institute of Social Welfare at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US