Nobody could accuse President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of a lack of confidence in his own abilities. Not even news that his popularity rating has now sunk to 19 percent could dent his belief that he is doing a good job of running the country. For him, the problem is that the public simply does not understand the government’s policies or how well they are working. For him, it is a failure of getting the message across. This is why the Cabinet is currently racking its brains trying to work out how best to package its policies and spin its achievements.
The much-derided “Economic Power-up Plan” ad, the brainchild of former Executive Yuan spokesman Hu Yu-wei (胡幼偉), was removed by YouTube after netizens complained that it was fraudulent, in what was a rather unfortunate first for the government. It tried to play it down, opting for the Hu-esque excuse of claiming the ad had fulfilled its purpose of attracting attention to the stimulus plan, and that there was no need to broadcast it anymore.
Now the Cabinet has come up with an even stranger plan: It wants to start a Facebook campaign to “unleash the potential of viral marketing” to spread its message online using social media. It also wants each ministry to set up its own Facebook fanclub, and it will give out rewards and sanctions depending on how many “fans” each ministry accumulates. Even before the campaign has started it is causing untold headaches for government officials.
Imagining that you can equate hits on Facebook with performance in government is just wrong-minded. You cannot translate these into some kind of measure of what the public thinks of how well individual ministries are doing. It is good that the government is trying to communicate its policies to the public, but it also has to be able to distinguish between the sounds of applause and booing.
The trouble with the achievements the government is so proud of is who they benefit, or don’t, as the case may be. It has allowed the import of US beef, but US beef is expensive and not the sort of thing most consumers can afford to put on the table. It has secured US visa-waiver status, but people are not going to rush out and fly to the US for a holiday just because it is now easier to do so. Yes, it is a breakthrough of sorts, but only a few people will benefit from it. It has reduced tariffs for certain kinds of fruit, but if government officials were to get out of their offices and look around the wet markets and supermarkets dotted around the city, they would find that these reductions have not translated into lower prices: the benefit is being pocketed by the importers, not the consumer. And postponing an increase in the minimum wage, while popular among employers, has angered millions of workers.
Then there is the rising unemployment rate, the energy price hikes and the drop in average salaries to the level they were 20 years ago: This is the kind of thing that is impacting the lives of ordinary people. And just as people are hearing that the Labor Pension Fund and other pension schemes are in danger of going bankrupt, it has been revealed that retired military personnel, teachers and public servants are not only to receive monthly pension payments equal to almost 90 percent of the salary they were paid when working, in addition to an 18 percent preferential interest rate on their savings, but that they can also expect a year-end bonus equal to 1.5 months’ salary. This news has angered around 70 percent of the population, who want to see this bonus, which is not required by law, scrapped.
The government believes its low popularity ratings are because of its own failure to communicate what it is doing right, but its attempts to blow its own horn are infuriating. People want to drum into Ma and his government that “it’s not the PR, stupid ... it’s your policies and your inability to govern properly.”
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China