The proposals of opposition parties to punish top government officials with pay cuts in the face of the nation’s economic slowdown and rising unemployment have garnered wide support from people looking for a more competent government and a better life, regardless of political affiliation. Unfortunately, the proposals were voted down in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated Legislative Yuan on Friday.
Of course, people understand that cutting the salaries of top officials will not help to boost Taiwan’s economy. They also realize that the government must urgently cut back unnecessary spending, adopt reform measures and push forward policies that set people’s livelihoods as the top priority.
However, the support for the pay-cuts proposals reflects the public’s mounting disappointment over the government’s handling of economic issues and sends a clear message that the government needs to feel some of the public’s pain during the current economic downturn.
The issue has once again raised concerns about political bickering only two weeks after the legislature voted down a motion of no confidence against Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) in a measure initiated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Whether opposition parties will table more proposals to challenge President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government remains to be seen. However, what is clear is that constant political confrontation does not help the economy.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) offered a thoughtful remark on Friday about a possibly negative effect of the opposition’s proposals to cut high-ranking government officials’ salaries. Doing so, Lee said, would badly damage their morale and discourage them from serving the country because their salaries are already lower than those of their peers in other countries.
According to local media reports, Lee said the solution to the nation’s economic woes did not lie in redressing the performance of top government officials, who were the same people serving the country when he was president. Instead, the real solution is to ask the government to implement economic measures efficiently and, more importantly, demand new leadership, he was quoted as telling the press.
In reality, asking top government officials to take a pay cut during difficult times may represent some basic democratic principles, such as asking top officials to bear their share of responsibility. With most of the public suffering during this economic downturn, there is no reason why top officials should be immune from such suffering.
On the other hand, this practice could also be a bad bet given the difficulties the government already faces in recruiting professionals and nurturing talent. If such a situation continues, the government will be left with only mediocre and incompetent officials.
With these factors in mind and putting politics aside, the government should realize that one way to make decisionmaking more efficient and competent is to replace poorly performing Cabinet officials in charge of economy-related departments with officials who have more economic sense and expertise. This is something on which lawmakers across party lines — including KMT legislators Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) and Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) — have agreed.
Another option is a complete Cabinet reshuffle, which will demand a bold and resolute premier who is able to remove incapable ministers, even in defiance of opposition from his own boss.
However, given Chen’s disposition and his performance thus far, let’s just keep our fingers crossed that he will transform into the kind of politician we want.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers