In their long and fruitless struggle against Chinese rule, Tibetans have often leaped on any reason to stay optimistic — and, for some, a new leader in Beijing offers a fresh glimmer of hope.
The rise of Xi Jinping (習近平), who is seen as China’s president-in-waiting, has set off a ripple of speculation that he may bring about a change of policy towards Tibet, which has been subject to a military crackdown since 2008.
One reason is that Xi’s father, Xi Zhongxun (習仲勳), met and came to know the Dalai Lama in Beijing in the early 1950s, before the Tibetan spiritual leader fled a failed uprising.
Xi senior, a party official at the time, later became a liberal vice premier known to be sympathetic towards minorities, and Tibetan exiles and analysts raise the possibility that such thinking may have passed down a generation.
“His father was familiar with Tibet and had an association with the Dalai Lama,” said Lobsang Sangay, prime minister of the Tibetan government-in-exile in the Indian hilltown of Dharamsala.
“Whether the son can be like the father is still to be seen,” he said. “Tibetans are always hopeful.”
Sangay is this week hosting a special meeting on how to respond to the scores of self-immolation protests against Chinese control, and delegates admit they are monitoring the Chinese transfer of power that is likely to start next month.
Beijing-watchers say that little is known about Xi Jinping’s true political leanings, though he has expressed the government’s routine disdain for the Dalai Lama and also vowed to “smash” any attempt to destroy stability in Tibet.
“His father did encounter the Dalai Lama when the Dalai Lama visited Beijing for a period in 1954,” said Barry Sautman, a Tibet expert at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. “It is possible that Xi Jinping might take more interest in Tibet as a result of his family, but it is a slender reed on which to base your hopes.”
Sarah McDowall, China expert at the IHS research group in London, sounded a similar note of caution over predictions that Xi would listen to Tibetans’ calls for autonomy and their complaints of increasingly brutal repression.
“It is really unlikely there will be any softening of policy towards Tibet,” she said.
“The security situation is still volatile after [unrest in] 2008, combined with the self-immolations, which have given renewed incentive to retain a hardline policy. It is not going to be the time for any new leader trying to consolidate their power base to be seen as weak on a matter of national integrity,” she said.
The last fatal protests were four weeks ago and analysts say each self-immolation case worsens a vicious cycle of further clampdowns by Chinese security forces and more anger across the Tibetan-inhabited areas of China.
“So long as the self-immolation problem persists, the Tibet policy is going to stay hardline and the Tibetans will actively resist that,” said Nathan Hill, a Tibet expert at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.
“Some officials in China understand this, but they are looking out for their careers and they are generally never blamed for tightening things even further,” he said.
Despite such dire warnings many Tibetans see fundamental change in China as their greatest — and perhaps only — hope, more than half a century since the Dalai Lama fled in 1959.
“Every change of leadership in the Chinese government brings optimism about positive changes that might take place,” Tsering Choedup, 39, Asia head of the International Tibet Network, said at the ongoing meeting in Dharamsala.
“China can’t remain unchanged forever with its economy becoming thrown open, and its politics will move too. It might take a while, but they are in transition,” he said.
Such attitudes are what Robbie Barnett, a professor of Tibetan studies at Columbia University, describes as the “futuristic optimism” that keeps the exiles’ dreams alive that one day they will be able to return to their homeland.
He believes the best they can expect in the short term is that Xi agrees to re-start a desultory talks program with Tibetan envoys that was last active in 2010.
And what does the Dalai Lama see in Xi Jinping’s presidency?
“We hope that the new leadership will bring positive changes that will help restore freedom and human dignity both in China and Tibet,” his office said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath