It is a shame that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has to wait until a small number of racist residents complain about dark-skinned foreigners before officials see the light and “decide to support the arts.”
The two would not seem to have anything to do with one another, but in a country where the absurd is witnessed on a daily basis — this is an independent nation with a president and a military, but many people consider it a province of China — it looks like xenophobia will lead to a cultural flowering at the Taipei Railway Station.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications and the Ministry of Culture have decided to transform the cavernous lobby of Taipei Railway Station into a temporary stage for young dancers, saying they are doing so to give young people a cultural space to express themselves.
This would be great if it did not come shortly after the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) started roping off certain areas of the lobby on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays after the Muslim holiday Eid al-Fitr brought too many dark-skinned Southeast Asians, as well as people from countries like India and Pakistan, who came to celebrate their holiday in a peaceful way.
Apparently, some Taiwanese commuters unaccustomed to multiculturalism — the kind of people with whom Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik would see eye to eye — complained that the crowds of foreigners made them feel unsafe.
In a typical overreaction, the TRA cordoned off what had been one of the few public gathering spaces for Southeast Asians in Taipei, and its announcement later of the dance venue, although on the surface a good thing, simply highlighted that foreign workers are not welcome.
The timing of these two ministries’ plan to promote the arts is suspicious. When has the Ministry of Culture ever been in a hurry to promote culture? More often than not, art venues in the country, such as the Huashan Creative Park and Treasure Hill Artist Community in Taipei, are utterly stripped of all free artistic expression as soon as the government gets involved. There never seems to be budgets available anywhere for painters, musicians, performers, actors, movie producers, or anything artistic, unless their art can become commercially viable in the short term. The Ministry of Culture has proven time and again that it does not support the arts.
So why the sudden change of heart and at a time when so many other cases of racial discrimination are surfacing around the country?
In Taoyuan County, a group of 30 Filipino workers are being forced to move out by next week because residents deem them to be a danger to the community.
In Taipei’s Shida area, police harass Westerners in the park at night even if they are quiet, while ignoring groups of Taiwanese, simply because of what one police officer said was a negative report in a local newspaper about Westerners “picking up drunk women” in the park.
Where will this end? Will Southeast Asians be welcome anywhere? Will foreigners someday be told to stay indoors after an 8pm curfew, while they are herded into foreigners-only dormitories and given no public space at all?
Taiwan, the open, welcome nation that it is, should not allow the forces of xenophobia to take control, because if it does, it will close itself off voluntarily from the rest of the region and the world.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength