Chinese interference
Referring to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech, the mayor of Corvallis, Oregon, Julie Manning, recently defended constituent David Lin’s (林銘新) rights against the Chinese Consulate General’s demand that Lin’s mural depicting Tibet’s and Taiwan’s struggle against tyranny be removed.
By contrast, when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) came to Taiwan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), against his citizens’ wishes, removed all Republic of China flags along the route that Chen would be passing through, surrendering to China’s wishes.
Ma gets paid a president’s wages, while a small-town mayor in Oregon is paid a US$100 monthly stipend. Who is the better leader? Who defends their citizens’ rights?
The mural incident was not the first time that China has tried to interfere with local US civic affairs. In 2006, Xuhui District in Shanghai, China, lobbied heavily to become a sister city of Irvine, California, but stipulated one condition: That Irvine not honor its five-year sister city bond with Taoyuan, Taiwan. After the condition was rejected, Xuhui decided not to pursue a sister city relationship with Irvine.
The Irvine incident drove a wedge between the city’s Democrat-controlled council and the Republican minority who uncovered the Chinese plot. Then-Irvine mayor Beth Krom and the city council were in a difficult position, having to choose between a powerful Chinese city district with large lobbying resources and a long-term sister city in democratic Taiwan. After hours of demonstration by Taiwanese-Americans and four hours of public debate lasting until midnight, the city council voted to maintain and honor the sister city relationship with Taoyuan. Xuhui chose not to sign on as a sister city. A few years later, the Irvine Sister City Foundation was dissolved, effectively abolishing Irvine’s sister city activities.
It is impossible to learn all the details of the Chinese plot, but this much was revealed: When Krom and her staff went to Shanghai to sign the sister city agreement, Krom’s assistant was called to another room, without the mayor’s knowledge, to sign a separate memorandum renouncing Taoyuan’s sister cityhood. When the delegates returned to Irvine, it was too late for the mayor to change course. Although the city council correctly voted to honor Taoyuan’s sister city relationship, the fact that the subsequent mayor of Irvine ended the city’s support of the Sister City Foundation indicates that China, through its local agents, continued to pressure city leaders after the event.
China’s attempts to take over Taiwan are very extensive. Its slogan “There is only one China in the world, and both Tibet and Taiwan belong to China” means: “There is only one tyranny in the world that claims it owns both Tibet and Taiwan.” Given such adversity, can Ma defend the rights of Taiwanese?
Stan Yang
Orange County, California
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS