Whenever there is mention of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), his successor, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), comes on all self-righteous, teeth gnashing. For the past four years, he has been acting rather sanctimoniously as the self-appointed flag-bearer in the fight against corruption.
The problem is, following a series of exposes of corruption involving people within his circle, this act has started to take on the air of parody. The Ma circus increasingly looks to be guilty of the very corruption it claims to be fighting.
The first person to apparently be caught with his hands in the cookie jar was former Cabinet secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世). It defies belief that anyone, be they public official or politician, goes from being completely clean to demanding huge backhanders overnight. It is inconceivable that the first time Lin ever took a bribe in his life, he went for the jugular and asked for more than NT$60 million (US$2.02 million). Nobody is going to believe that, especially since that would mean the first time he took a bribe, he was so distinctly aware of the value of what he was offering. Otherwise, why would he not come out with a nice round figure like NT$50 million, NT$60 million or NT$70 million? He asked for exactly NT$63 million. Where did he pluck such a precise figure from?
If that were not unbelievable enough, several months into the investigation, the focus is still almost entirely on Lin himself. There seems to be some kind of impenetrable barrier surrounding the people around him, making it seem as if Lin were the only one involved in such a major corruption scandal. It is as if the investigators saw only the event that started it all off, but were blind to any other leads. It is really quite impressive that Lin was single-handedly able to divert attention from the others.
The second scandal raining on Ma’s parody is one involving a group of senior law enforcement officials, including former Criminal Investigation Bureau chief secretary Hsu Jui-shan (許瑞山). The severity of the scandal was exacerbated by the nature of the positions held by those involved: As senior police officers, they would have known exactly what they were doing. Here we had parts of legitimate society protecting and supporting gangsters. Because these officials have become distinguishable from criminals only by virtue of the badge they wear, a line has been crossed and the distinction between right and wrong, good and evil has been blurred. People are justified in wondering who is worse: these trusted members of legitimate society or the gangsters? It has become difficult to distinguish between the two.
It brings to mind the situation some years ago when former independent legislator Lo Fu-chu (羅福助), known for his involvement in the criminal underworld, stood up in the Legislative Yuan and, addressing certain other individuals in the chamber, said: “My night is brighter than the day [of those who call me a gangster].”
It is a sentiment that resounds even today.
Former National Fire Agency director-general Huang Chi-min (黃季敏) was praised for his efforts during the Typhoon Morakot disaster response in 2009 by then-premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), and visited by Ma when he collapsed after leading the relief response without a break.
Three years later, it was discovered that Huang and his wife had somehow been able to remit ¥200 million (US$2.56 million) to Japan to buy property over there, in addition to charging more than NT$10 million on their credit cards, sending their offspring to the US to study and still having plenty left to buy 16.5kg of gold bars without blinking, all on their civil servant’s salaries.
According to Huang, the gold bars were purchased with money earned from stock investments, but the investigation revealed that Huang and his wife had actually lost money on the stock market. This was only one of their lies. When they retired, they declared only 3kg of gold to the Control Yuan. If this is not a classic case of giving yourself away by protesting your innocence, what is?
The most recent corruption case to come to light involved four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-affiliated Pingtung County councilors, including a former county council speaker, who subsequently had their election results declared invalid and were sent to prison. Pingtung County Council has a total of 55 members, of whom nine have had their election results invalidated due to vote-buying. Of these nine, two were independents and the others, to a man — or woman — KMT. It seems that there is a KMT tradition of vote-buying that does not seem to have ended under the leadership of “Teflon Ma.”
The rot has set in and permeates all levels of society, from KMT-elected representatives to senior law enforcement officers to technocrats. Given the nature of this close-knit syndicate, and these unconscionable links between legitimate society and the criminal world, can Ma really, in good faith, still claim to wave the flag of clean government and the fight against corruption?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US