The Executive Yuan has just passed a draft political party act, stipulating that political parties cannot invest in profit-making operations or engage in profit-making activities. Any party that has these kinds of investments must transfer ownership of them or sell their shares within two years. If they are unable to do so, they have to turn them over to a trust, or face a fine.
The National Communications Commission has recently given the Want Want China Times Group approval, subject to certain conditions, to acquire several cable TV services from China Network Systems. These conditions are: Want Want needs to drop CtiTV’s news channel, and China Television’s (CTV) digital news channel must be changed to a non-news channel that has an independent news editorial system.
According to Next Magazine, Want Want chairman Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明) is considering handing CtiTV and CTV over to a trust to comply with the commission’s conditions.
Both the draft political party act and the Want Want acquisition involve the use of trusts. As the author of a book on the subject, Trusts and You (信託與你), there are a few things I would like to say about this:
Article 1 of the Trust Act (信託法) states: “The term ‘trust’ refers to the legal relationship in which the settler transfers or disposes of a right of property and causes the trustee to administer or dispose of the trust property according to the stated purposes of the trust for the benefit of a beneficiary or for a specified purpose.”
Not everyone is comfortable with “legalese,” so to put it into layman’s terms, the article is saying: “I have complete trust in you, so I will, on the face of it, register my property under your name, although it will still be, for all intents and purposes, mine. I am simply entrusting you to take care of my property, and while you are, I expect you to do so according to my directions and in the way that I tell you to.”
The “stated purposes” referred to in the article depend entirely on the agreement signed between the settlor and the trustee. It goes without saying that the settlor will benefit from the agreement and the way in which it is carried out. With the exception of public trusts, which are for the benefit of society as a whole for charitable, cultural, academic, technological or religious reasons, the benefit is aimed entirely at the settlor, so they are the sole beneficiary.
If this is what a trust means — that a political party can keep its money in this way to enable it to conduct unfair election campaigns, and Want Want can still control, directly or indirectly, CtiTV and CTV— and if this really is the case, then the stipulations of the political party act as well as the commission’s conditions for the deal are a bit of a joke, are they not?
Yu Ying-fu is a lawyer.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers