When the latest typhoon hit the nation, it forced up the prices of vegetables and the public saw, once again, government officials making a show of inspecting the prices being charged by retail outlets. I say “making a show” because this is basically what it was, given that the real effects — major price increases — unfolded anyway.
Typhoon Tembin did not cause serious damage to any vegetable-producing regions, but prices went up all the same. It is time, then, to start looking for shortcomings in the system.
In addition to the general psychological conditioning that says vegetable prices must increase following a typhoon, the real reason this is happening is because of manipulation by middlemen.
Over the past few years, systems providing for the transportation and sale of agricultural products have gone through many major changes. In the past, deals that took place in wholesale markets in the regions where the produce was consumed accounted for more than 70 percent of the total volume of transactions. However, the volume in many areas has dropped in recent years, and such transactions now only account for about 50 percent of the total volume.
Reference prices for agricultural products can no longer be determined simply by looking at the prices being charged at wholesale markets in the areas where the produce is being consumed. Often the promotional prices — and even the regular prices — of vegetables being sold in supermarkets and hypermarkets may be cheaper than the prices at wholesale markets.
This is a reflection of the fact that many types of produce are no longer being jointly transported to and sold at wholesale markets — the method commonly employed in the past — but are instead increasingly being produced on a contract basis.
Such contract production transactions are not a part of the wholesale market transaction mechanism and that means that when a typhoon hits — even if it does not damage crops — all consumers can do is stand by helplessly and watch as middlemen increase their resale prices. Over time, this behavior hurts the interests of consumers and producers, while middlemen cream off big, fat profits.
Government policy must take care of the needs of both consumers and producers, although this may seem to be a difficult goal to achieve. To that end, I would like to make the following recommendations:
First, producers need to be given access to adequate information so that they can negotiate with middlemen using shared knowledge. Second, a sound system of guarantees must be established and an environment must be created that allows the reselling of contracts to help minimize the risk of breach of contract. And third, producers should be given timely disaster insurance assistance so as to minimize the amount of risk they are exposed to.
These are the only ways to address and improve the price differences resulting from the transportation and sales systems and to reduce an unreasonable distribution risk.
Joseph Chang is an associate professor in the Department of Labor Relations and Human Resources at the Chinese Culture University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers