The issue of euthanasia continues to agitate courtrooms and challenge the predominant legal opinions of the day. On Aug. 16, the UK’s High Court rejected 58-year old Tony Nicklinson’s request for euthanasia (Editor’s note: Nicklinson died on Aug. 22 of pneumonia). Seven years ago, Nicklinson was paralyzed from the neck down and rendered unable to talk after experiencing a stroke and developing locked-in syndrome, although he was able to communicate his wishes via a communications device.
Early 20th century US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once said: “The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.” The High Court’s decision was logical, although it failed to respect Nicklinson’s values. The expression on Nicklinson’s face after his request was rejected was very moving. A person’s mood is capable of expressing great insight and understanding. This issue can offer us a chance to contemplate what we would think and do if we were in a similar position.
It is possible that each of us could end up leading an unbearable life as a result of an illness or accident. We should think about what we would want other people to do to help us, as well as the rights to decide the outcome of our own lives if we were to end up with locked-in syndrome or in persistent vegetative state, leaving our spirit trapped deep inside an insensate body.
Nicklinson’s case showed that the English legal system is not willing to take responsibility and instead sought to place the blame on parliament. Currently in Europe, it is only the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg and Switzerland where it is not considered illegal for doctors to prescribe lethal medication. The European Court of Human Rights recently ordered Germany to compensate Ulrich Koch for damages and legal costs after his disabled wife asked to be allowed to die, although German law prohibits people from assisting another person in committing suicide. After Koch’s wife traveled to Switzerland for assisted suicide in 2005, the European court ruled that German courts had infringed upon their privacy and family life.
Over the past 11 years, more than 800 people have traveled to Switzerland for assisted suicide — more than 60 percent of whom were German, followed by French and then Britons. Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service has clearly stated that relatives who aid an assisted suicide will not be prosecuted.
Since the Netherlands legalized euthanasia in 2001, about 2,300 people travel to the country each year for assisted suicide. The US state of Oregon has allowed doctors to carry out assisted suicides since 1998, with Washington state following in 2008. These two states implemented this change to the law after holding referendums on the issue. In the state of Montana, euthanasia is decided upon by local courts. In an analysis on Oregon from 1998 to 2004, the New England Journal of Medicine found that of the 326 prescriptions for lethal medication issued by doctors, only 208 were used; research also shows that euthanasia is not being abused. One ethicist thought that disadvantaged groups would be sacrificed by this practice, but data has shown that those who receive these prescriptions do not use them straight away, that a third of them end up not using them at all and most of the people receiving these prescriptions are white people from the middle classes and above. In the end, these data convinced the ethicist to change his mind.
The attitudes toward euthanasia is a sign of how mature a society is. I consider both logic and reason and respect both the feelings and the pain of those suffering. While it is a fiercely debated topic, euthanasia is the ultimate expression of individualism and existentialism. Legal euthanasia is an expression of humanity’s dignified spiritual hope for freedom, as well as expression of the desire to obtain the right to die from fellow humans with empathy and compassion. In today’s modern and free society it is indeed strange that, while suicide is not viewed as a crime, the right to death is prohibited.
What people generally fail to realize is that legalizing the right to die will not make people only think about dying. Instead, euthanasia allows people with severe illnesses to feel more at ease about their situation and gives them the courage to keep on living.
Holmes’ successor as a Supreme Court judge, Benjamin Cardozo, once said: “The law, like the traveler, must be ready for the morrow. It must have a principle of growth.” Compared to the inroads the West has made with euthanasia, the Taiwanese public lacks any strategy and remains disorganized. There are also no cases of anyone here demanding the right to die from a court; instead, people frequently break the law by taking the matter in their own hands. Taiwanese society also lacks groups and legislators that support euthanasia. Despite the fact that almost 70 percent of Taiwanese support euthanasia in some form, it seems it will be a long, long time before it is allowed here.
Chiang Sheng is an attending physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95