When the flotilla of 21 fishing boats arrived at an island chain at the center of a growing territorial dispute with China, the captains warned the dozens of activists and politicians aboard not to attempt a landing.
Ten of the activists jumped into the shark-infested waters anyway, swimming ashore on Sunday last week and planting the rising sun flag that evokes painful memories of Imperial Japan’s 20th-century march across Asia.
“We feel that they dragged us into an international incident,” said Masanori Tamashiro, one of the boat captains.
That feeling is widely shared in Japan, where a small band of nationalists has pushed the country to assert itself more boldly to counter China’s and South Korea’s economic rise and the former’s quickly evolving territorial ambitions. The conflict with China has raised the specter that the US, Japan’s longtime defender, could be pulled into the fight.
The nationalists have gained traction for their cause in recent months by taking advantage of the Japenese government’s political weakness, forcing the governing party to take a tougher stand on the islands, known as the Senkakus in Japan and the Diaoyutais (釣魚台) in China and Taiwan, which also claims them.
Yet the activists are also tapping into a widespread anxiety over China, which intensified two years ago during the last major flare-up over the Diaoyutais. China retaliated then for Japan’s arrest of a fishing captain by starving Japan of the rare earths needed for its already struggling electronics industry. That anxiety became more pronounced in recent months as China expanded its claims in the nearby South China Sea, challenging Vietnam, the Philippines and others over more than 40 islands in a vast area, and backing its statements with aggressive moves that included sending larger patrol boats to disputed waters.
There is still little appetite in pacifist Japan for a full-blown confrontation with China. However, analysts say consensus is growing on the need to stand up to China as power in the region appears to slip further from economically fading Japan and the US.
“We are all gearing up for an international tug of war in this region,” said Narushige Michishita, an expert on security issues at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo. “Whenever the distribution of power changes in a dramatic way, people start to redraw lines.”
That is what is happening in the South China Sea, which has received more international attention than Japan’s territorial battles. However, experts say the increasingly shrill war of words over disputed islands between Japan and its East Asian neighbors, including China and South Korea, is potentially more explosive. Unlike in the South China Sea, where the frictions center on competition for natural resources, the East Asian island disputes are more about history, rooted in lingering — and easily ignited — anger over Japan’s brutal dominance decades ago.
Those raw emotions were loosed over the weekend, as hundreds and possibly thousands of Chinese — in protests that were at least tolerated by the government — poured into the streets in several cities to denounce Japan’s claims over the Senkakus.
“The stakes are much higher in East Asia because you have bigger countries in close proximity, and the conflicts are more direct and emotional,” said Kent Calder, director of the Edwin O. Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies at Johns Hopkins University.
The ramifications for the US are also potentially more troubling, analysts said. Washington has been urging Japan and South Korea to pick up more of the burden of defending against China and North Korea, but the countries’ latest standoff over islets that sit between them, known as Takeshima in Japan and Dokdo in South Korea, contributed to Seoul’s decision to back out of an agreement to share military intelligence with Tokyo.
An even bigger, though remote, risk for the US is that it could be dragged into an armed conflict between China and Japan, which it is obligated by treaty to defend, some analysts said.
“There is a real possibility that if diplomacy fails, there will be a war,” said Kazuhiko Togo, a former career Japanese diplomat who has written on the issue.
The current row between Japan and China was started by Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara, a longtime and outspoken advocate of conservative issues. Last spring, he said he wanted Tokyo to buy the islands from their current owner, a Japanese citizen, to better defend them from China. Under pressure not to look weak in advance of elections, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda quickly said the central government would buy the islands instead.
That set off a tit-for-tat between activists from both countries. First, seven Hong Kong activists landed last week on Uotori, the largest of the disputed islands, and were among 14 Chinese arrested by Japan and quickly deported. Japanese nationalists retaliated with their landing on the same island on Sunday.
That flotilla left from Ishigaki Island, on the southern edge of the Okinawa island chain about 128km from the Diaoyutais.
Yoshiyuki Toita, a 42-year-old member of Ishigaki’s city assembly, was one of the few local residents who joined the expedition.
“Japan has come to the point that it must change,” Toita said. “The era of just depending on the United States is over.”
Even so, Toita agreed with mainstream opinion that Japan should cleave more closely to the US.
Still, the Japanese government has taken at least some actions to show its willingness to push back at China, most notably redrawing its national defense strategy, which had once focused on the former Soviet Union in the north, but now will concentrate on protecting against China in the south. An opinion poll in October last year conducted by the Japanese prime minister’s office showed a growing wariness, with more than 70 percent of Japanese saying they do not have “friendly feelings” toward China.
Such sentiments have even made inroads in Ishigaki, a part of Okinawa, where a deep pacifism was born of the anger at the Japanese Imperial Army’s forcing of civilians to commit suicide during World War II, as well as the heavy US troop presence after the war.
As Chinese warships and patrol boats become a more frequent sight, some islanders have begun to speak out more in support of the US and Japanese militaries, even as sentiment against US bases remains strong. Since the events two years ago when China cut off supplies of rare earths, Ishigaki Mayor Yoshitaka Nakayama began flying the rising sun flag in front of city hall for the first time since World War II.
At the same time, Nakayama, 45, said he values his island’s growing trade and tourism links to the Chinese-speaking world, especially Taiwan.
Tamashiro, the fishing boat captain, expressed similar conflicted feelings, even as he has begun taking more activists to see the islands.
“Basically, fishermen don’t want the politics to disrupt their livelihoods,” Tamashiro said.
However, at US$4,500 per boat charter, he said, going to the Senkakus “is not bad money.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers