Just when you thought the government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had done all it can to discredit and besmirch the reputation of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), out comes a new story in which the Ministry of Justice is considering stripping Chen of an honorary medal he received as president.
The Presidential Office says the ministry is mulling the legalities involved with stripping the imprisoned ex-president of the Order of Brilliant Jade with Grand Cordon, the Republic of China’s equivalent of the US Medal of Honor, and which is given solely to incumbent presidents or bestowed on heads of state of diplomatic allies.
Chen is down, and like a schoolyard bully, Ma wants to kick him. He wants to continue to rub Chen’s fall from power in his face, as much as he can, for as long as he can, until the former president is broken mentally and physically. These constant prosecutions and moves to discredit anything Chen or his family has ever done constitute a form of slow torture.
The Presidential Office says it is acting on behalf of the public, which wants the medal retrieved from Chen because he is now in prison. However, this is a lame excuse that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Ma government can use anytime they want to do something in their own interest — all they must do is gesture to the mob and say it is the will of the public, before they go about their own business.
The truth is that the Ma government is unpopular — its policies are weak and even its friends are losing their motivation to support it. Ma’s poll ratings are so low that it is doubtful he would be able to beat even the most junior Democratic Progressive Party official in an election at this point.
However, when Ma feels the heat, he always has his favorite whipping boy to turn to — just wheel out the big bad Chen and make a further example of him for the public to gawk at, and all will be well, right, Ma?
The problem is, the public is a lot smarter than Ma gives it credit for. People realize the government is using Chen to distract attention away from its own inept policies and corruption scandals. They realize Ma and the KMT have a vendetta against Chen and will likely not stop until the former president dies in jail. They realize that this government is just as dirty as any that has sat in the Presidential Office. The public has only to look at disgraced former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世), and the slow pace at which prosecutors are looking into his case, and they can realize that this is just the tip of the Ma government’s corrupt iceberg.
However, the worst thing about this latest case of Chen bashing is just how petty it is. Ma is unable to find more cases of possible corruption involving Chen, Chen’s family, Chen’s former officials or Chen’s friends, so he had to resort to something as small-minded as stripping him of former honors. What next? Will Ma now turn to Chen’s elementary school report cards and tell the public that he cheated on his exams? Will Ma seek to have Chen’s high-school graduation annulled?
However, it is all for nothing, because no matter how hard Ma works to make Chen look bad, the former president will never look as bad as Ma.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would