The government has been calling on local manufacturers to develop new products and services to remain competitive. However, there is a blind spot that the government has failed to detect. That is the government has itself forgotten to develop innovative policies to assist firms to cope with new industrial challenges, such as the recent global economic slowdown.
Tough medicine is required these days. Last week, the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting & Statistics (DGBAS) lowered its export growth forecast for this year to minus-1.72 percent, with the eurozone debt crisis, the fragile US economic situation and wobbly Chinese economy making it unlikely that Taiwan will be able to eke out annual growth of 0.07 percent as it had been expecting in May. That prompted the agency to slash its annual GDP growth projection from 2.08 percent to 1.66 percent this year. To buoy decelerating exports, the Ministry of Economic Affairs last week proposed extending tax rebates to the full range of export goods. Such a tax refund is nothing new for Taiwan and it is a seemingly effective tool in many developing countries.
Four years ago, this kind of stimulus measure was implemented to boost exports during the global financial meltdowns which froze private consumption and crippled exports. In July of last year, when the US-South Korea free-trade pact took effect, the government used this trick again. This allowed exporters to recoup custom tariffs in order to minimize the pact’s annihilation of Taiwan’s exports by South Korean firms.
The fact is offering tax rebates helps lower the price of exports, but it does not enhance the value of locally made products. For the same reason, the central bank is facing constant pressure to keep the New Taiwan dollar weak against the US dollar. This gives exporters a price advantage over competitors. However, the central bank has realized that devaluing the currency is not a cure-all. It has also realized that cheaper products will not help exporters. New remedies are required immediately.
In a rare call, central bank Governor Peng Fai-nan (彭淮南) said recently that government agencies should assist HTC in exporting more phones overseas, implying that government agencies need to use more effective and inventive ways to stimulate exports. The DGBAS attributed a 20 percent monthly decline in exports to the US last month to HTC’s poor performance. Compared to the previous month, the Taoyuan-based company shipped US$730 million less of goods to the US last month.
Peng’s brief comments sparked a debate on how to rescue HTC and prompted patriotic calls to buy more HTC phones. It would be pragmatic to help HTC in their patent battles with Apple and other rivals. As a result of an intellectual property lawsuit with Apple, HTC’s new smartphones were temporarily barred from entering the US market in May. This development affected HTC’s second-quarter sales figures. However, HTC was allowed to enter the US market and ship new products to its partner T-Mobile after the company submitted evidence that it has revised its products to circumvent disputed patents.
As patent wars become a way for big brands to keep local firms at bay, the government should better utilize the patent portfolios and resources owned by the state-funded research body Industrial Technology Research Institute.
This may not be a traditional way to boost exports. However, if local firms can establish a better position in these disputes they can sell more goods, which in turn will secure exports.
Some unconventional and innovative thinking is required from government officials to help the nation boost its exports.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers