The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will hold its 18th National Congress this fall as part of its one-in-a-decade change in party leadership. However, just when it will do so remains a major question; no one outside the inner circle seems to know or is willing to say. At a press conference earlier this week, the deputy head of the CCP’s Organization Department, Wang Jingqing (王京清), could only say that it was planned for the second half of the year.
Such secrecy is a reminder of the opaqueness that surrounds and shrouds the workings of both the party and the Chinese government. The world knows there will be a party congress. It knows that Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) will be handing over the reins of the party ahead of his stepping down from the presidency early next year. It is clear that his heir apparent is Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平). About the only thing that can be said with conviction about the CCP congress is that it will be held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
Now compare and contrast the Chinese secrecy with the openness that surrounds Taiwan’s system, in which everybody knows who the contenders will be well before a party’s leadership election — or in the case of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the contender, since the KMT, like the CCP, prides itself on presenting a unified face to the public and doesn’t think that intra-party democracy is really a good idea. Party platforms are hashed out in public.
Or look at the US, with the upcoming Democratic and Republican party conventions ahead of November’s general elections. The Democrats will be meeting for a week in Charlotte, North Carolina, starting on Sept. 3. The announcement of the Charlotte meeting was made in February last year. Republicans will be meeting the week before in Tampa, Florida. The choice of Tampa was made in May 2010. Both parties have begun to release the line-up of speakers at the conventions.
Wang said the procedures for selecting delegates to the party congress have been streamlined to make them more efficient and that there will be more candidates for delegates than available seats so local party committees will see some “democracy” in voting for delegates. However, the selection of the real powers remains hidden. How the 200 members of the party’s Central Committee will be selected or how they will choose the politburo and its nine-member Standing Committee, Wang refused to say. Since seven of those nine members will be standing down, it is only natural to wonder who their replacements might be, or even who might be up for contention. But from Beijing, there is only silence. And yet Wang’s spokesman, Deng Shengming (鄧聲明), stressed that the electoral system was very open and transparent.
What is known is that in May, more than 300 top party cadres were asked to list the officials they thought should make the Standing Committee. According to rumors from Beijing, several people linked to Hu’s political base did not do as well as some had expected.
The other thing that is known is that one impediment to a smooth-running party congress is about to be cleared away — the scandal surrounding former Chongqing secretary-general Bo Xilai (薄熙來), whose rapid plummet from grace earlier this year reopened public concerns about corruption at the highest levels of the party. His wife, Gu Kailai (谷開來), whose seven-hour murder trial took place a week ago, will hear her verdict on Monday. Whatever the eventual decision is about Bo, it looks like his wife is going to take the flak.
The lid that is kept on information about the halls of power in Beijing is simply another reminder of how little is known about its decisionmaking process and the decisionmakers. While some may feel that there is too much publicity-seeking and a surfeit of information during the Taiwanese and US electoral process, it is far better than the alternative. All Beijing’s secret machinations do is raise suspicions and distrust.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US