The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will hold its 18th National Congress this fall as part of its one-in-a-decade change in party leadership. However, just when it will do so remains a major question; no one outside the inner circle seems to know or is willing to say. At a press conference earlier this week, the deputy head of the CCP’s Organization Department, Wang Jingqing (王京清), could only say that it was planned for the second half of the year.
Such secrecy is a reminder of the opaqueness that surrounds and shrouds the workings of both the party and the Chinese government. The world knows there will be a party congress. It knows that Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) will be handing over the reins of the party ahead of his stepping down from the presidency early next year. It is clear that his heir apparent is Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平). About the only thing that can be said with conviction about the CCP congress is that it will be held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
Now compare and contrast the Chinese secrecy with the openness that surrounds Taiwan’s system, in which everybody knows who the contenders will be well before a party’s leadership election — or in the case of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the contender, since the KMT, like the CCP, prides itself on presenting a unified face to the public and doesn’t think that intra-party democracy is really a good idea. Party platforms are hashed out in public.
Or look at the US, with the upcoming Democratic and Republican party conventions ahead of November’s general elections. The Democrats will be meeting for a week in Charlotte, North Carolina, starting on Sept. 3. The announcement of the Charlotte meeting was made in February last year. Republicans will be meeting the week before in Tampa, Florida. The choice of Tampa was made in May 2010. Both parties have begun to release the line-up of speakers at the conventions.
Wang said the procedures for selecting delegates to the party congress have been streamlined to make them more efficient and that there will be more candidates for delegates than available seats so local party committees will see some “democracy” in voting for delegates. However, the selection of the real powers remains hidden. How the 200 members of the party’s Central Committee will be selected or how they will choose the politburo and its nine-member Standing Committee, Wang refused to say. Since seven of those nine members will be standing down, it is only natural to wonder who their replacements might be, or even who might be up for contention. But from Beijing, there is only silence. And yet Wang’s spokesman, Deng Shengming (鄧聲明), stressed that the electoral system was very open and transparent.
What is known is that in May, more than 300 top party cadres were asked to list the officials they thought should make the Standing Committee. According to rumors from Beijing, several people linked to Hu’s political base did not do as well as some had expected.
The other thing that is known is that one impediment to a smooth-running party congress is about to be cleared away — the scandal surrounding former Chongqing secretary-general Bo Xilai (薄熙來), whose rapid plummet from grace earlier this year reopened public concerns about corruption at the highest levels of the party. His wife, Gu Kailai (谷開來), whose seven-hour murder trial took place a week ago, will hear her verdict on Monday. Whatever the eventual decision is about Bo, it looks like his wife is going to take the flak.
The lid that is kept on information about the halls of power in Beijing is simply another reminder of how little is known about its decisionmaking process and the decisionmakers. While some may feel that there is too much publicity-seeking and a surfeit of information during the Taiwanese and US electoral process, it is far better than the alternative. All Beijing’s secret machinations do is raise suspicions and distrust.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers